Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No idea... didn't ask the details.
I have another friend who seems to keep getting loans too despite having no income? Honestly the system here is pretty slack... funny how people keep saying there's no subprime
Quite correct.
I can tell you from personal experience that a lower LVR means zip if the servicability is not there.
nothing wrong with 70, nothing at all. Thats more than 1 year salary for alot of people.
The thing with real estate is the multiplier effect that occurs over the years. It can take 10 years or if you buy at the right time it can take alot less.
The longer you hold the greater the multiplier effect. then when you look back you think, gee property was so cheap in those days, I should have bought more!
Which banks are that? I seriously doubt that. Lending has been cut back quite a bit. there are a few major developers of apartments in melbourne where finance has dried up and now buyers are waiting out the sunset clause of 5 years + for their deposit.
Last year - From personal experience i couldn't get a loan as i was categorized as closing my loan too quickly. i had equity, cashflow, stable job of 5 years with annual income over 6 figures and only 1 investment property. in the end i could take loan of 65% of the purchase price. I had this experience from 5 lenders so it is a bit of a suprise to me.
Lots of agents had sales when the buyers finance fell through. That includes one of my property which was put up for sale. I don't think you can get 500K loan without any proof of stable income. i would say it is most likely asian countries like china (which has highly inflated property prices) or malaysia for one which would have a subprime. china will bust first before australia. Apartments over there in Malaysia are like more expensive that the ones in australia and their income is less than what someone who earns here and 1/3 of the currency too.
Personally I rarely sell, some of the properties I have owned for years cover the short fall on the more recent purchases. My idea is to eventually live of the excess rental income.Is it better to just keep accumulating rental properties (never sell) or should you sell when there is a sizable profit?
If you just keep accumulating properties you never really enjoy your profits. I mean, sure, your equity increases over the years and the banks gladly hand out cash, which you then have to reinvest to repay the bank and therefore claim a tax deduction.
If any of the loaned money is used for private purposes, then whacko, no tax deduction on that portion.
If you sell your investment property there generally is CGT to pay and your investment portfolio gets smaller.
Makes me think..to sell or not to sell?
Is it better to just keep accumulating rental properties (never sell) or should you sell when there is a sizable profit?
If you just keep accumulating properties you never really enjoy your profits. I mean, sure, your equity increases over the years and the banks gladly hand out cash, which you then have to reinvest to repay the bank and therefore claim a tax deduction.
If any of the loaned money is used for private purposes, then whacko, no tax deduction on that portion.
If you sell your investment property there generally is CGT to pay and your investment portfolio gets smaller.
Makes me think..to sell or not to sell?
Never sell.
But Zed, did your parents make more money ie are they better off now that they sold the 2 units to buy the house?
I can point at two renovator's nightmares (one subdivisible) and two blocks that fit the bill and all but one have been for sale for quite some time, so no issues there, spoilt for choice in fact.
I'd rather have few properties and low debt than a huge debt and squillions of houses.
I like the points raised. I think either way you go (sell or accumulate) - makes money!
sorry for the ramblings, but it seems to me that the "never sell option" is sure way to creating huge wealth.
At some point, increasing net assets is no longer the most important thing, especially if you don't believe in LOE. At some point, it's about increasing cashflow.
Theres always a property boom from my experience - mid 70s (big), 1982 (medium), 1988 (humungus), 2003 (big), 2009(small), 20??
.
Quite correct.
I can tell you from personal experience that a lower LVR means zip if the servicability is not there.