Not really, i remember one argument used by private equity. Debt teaches you to be efficient, you cant wear 'fat' because of the debt factor.I'd be pretty close to IV's 30/70 rule.
70% on investing, 30% on living expenses (car, food, entertainment).
I have a highly geared portfolio tho so its more forced, probably not something to envy lol.
Regards,
RH
Debt forces the efficiency factor to come into play.
Look from an alternative viewpoint, if you didnt have the debt in play, then you might be more tempted to spend on 'non-wealth creation items'.
Having said the above though, my ultimate preference in the current environment is less debt full stop. Investment angles will present themselves periodically, but if your shop is full of debt already, you wont be able to maximise the benefit that such opportunities present.
In the current environment i am trying to be very flexible.
As i mentioned i am in the black now for the 2010 calender year, i wouldnt be in this situation if i was fully leveraged at the start of 2010.