It seems from what my Bank is telling me now, that the more IP's I buy - the more I have to be earning. I thought they took into account the rents as income. So wouldn't it work out that the more properties you acquired the more income you'd be earning. Maybe I'm having a blonde day or something!
My Bank is saying that in between buying IP No. 2 & 3 I now have a shortfall of between $800-$1,000 a month in income, so cannot buy IP No. 4. ($100k). I can't figure it out. I bought all my properties for under $100k and they're all positive cash-flow.
So does this mean that everytime I buy another IP I have to be earning more and more money. Wouldn't that mean by the time I get to No. 20 I'd have to be earning like $1m+ a year? Sounds stupid to me. How do they work out serviceability.
Cheers, QB
My Bank is saying that in between buying IP No. 2 & 3 I now have a shortfall of between $800-$1,000 a month in income, so cannot buy IP No. 4. ($100k). I can't figure it out. I bought all my properties for under $100k and they're all positive cash-flow.
So does this mean that everytime I buy another IP I have to be earning more and more money. Wouldn't that mean by the time I get to No. 20 I'd have to be earning like $1m+ a year? Sounds stupid to me. How do they work out serviceability.
Cheers, QB