Hi All
I am considering setting up a SMSF to invest in property. However, before doing so, I would like to get your opinion about a few points. First my situation:
Wife and I have around 115,000 in super (combined) and are both 41 years old, which means an investment horizon of over 20 years.
I keep hearing that if you don't have A LOT of money, then it is not worthwhile to setup a SMSF due to the costs involved.
What is your view on that? Is 115,000 too little for a SMSF?
Another consideration is the fact that I have my life insurance through my current fund. Could I keep this fund after setting up a SMSF for the purposes of insurance?
Finally, to complicate things a little bit, there is a good chance that I will be moving out of Australia for a period of 2 years to work overseas. During this time my employer will not be contributing to the fund. I assume that would not be a problem provided the property is cash flow neutral or positive.
Do you agree?
Any insights will be much appreciated.
Thanks
BP
I am considering setting up a SMSF to invest in property. However, before doing so, I would like to get your opinion about a few points. First my situation:
Wife and I have around 115,000 in super (combined) and are both 41 years old, which means an investment horizon of over 20 years.
I keep hearing that if you don't have A LOT of money, then it is not worthwhile to setup a SMSF due to the costs involved.
What is your view on that? Is 115,000 too little for a SMSF?
Another consideration is the fact that I have my life insurance through my current fund. Could I keep this fund after setting up a SMSF for the purposes of insurance?
Finally, to complicate things a little bit, there is a good chance that I will be moving out of Australia for a period of 2 years to work overseas. During this time my employer will not be contributing to the fund. I assume that would not be a problem provided the property is cash flow neutral or positive.
Do you agree?
Any insights will be much appreciated.
Thanks
BP