Of course if the land being acquired is a trading asset (ie a prop developer) there is no cost-base. The duty adds to the acquisition cost so that the carrying value of trading stock is increased. No CGT cost-base. Ditto legal costs, surveyors etc. Then there can be the apportionment issues of that actual cost which requires the total cost to be split into seperate lots using a reasonable basis.
And I have come accross developers who had both...A larger potion was trading stock and a portion was "keep" hence a CGT asset and the associated GST issues. Not smart but it happens.
Too many posts assume CGT is the only form of taxation applying to property.
Mike - You keeping dry? Thoughts go to all in the Phillipines at the moment.