I haven't seen anyone yet who would prefer to pay more rent....they'd rather spend the money on the latest electronic gadget or a holidayOften they have the funds, they just would prefer to not give it to you
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I haven't seen anyone yet who would prefer to pay more rent....they'd rather spend the money on the latest electronic gadget or a holidayOften they have the funds, they just would prefer to not give it to you
I haven't seen anyone yet who would prefer to pay more rent....they'd rather spend the money on the latest electronic gadget or a holiday
What's a good tenant? Keeping the house clean and tidy and the yard maintained while paying the rent on time is nothing special, it is their legal obligation.
I was instructed by my PM that now that the tenants have been living in the property for just on a year and with the increase in cost of living and interest rates that it would be a good idea to increase then rent.
john
I guess it is always important to keep a good relationship with the tenant and to come to some type of compromise when it comes to situations like this, but this is not the case here. They are just not willing to take a $5 increase let alone a $10 or $15. Yes i believe the tenant should have a say, but if the landlord can justify the reasons for the increase and not just for the purpose of lining his/her pockets then both parties should be able to come to an agreement.
This has not been the case here and so i was somewhat surprised when the PM informed me that the tenants informed they could not afford any increase whatsoever.
So it is a tough decision as they have been good tenants but at the same token it is an indication that they are not willing to budge regardless of whether my costs as a landlord keep increasing.
Thanks once again for the feedback!
John
i believe the tenant should have a say, but if the landlord can justify the reasons for the increase and not just for the purpose of lining his/her pockets then both parties should be able to come to an agreement.
That was my immediate thought too.You seem to be very new at this LL thing?
Compromise? I never compromise. When allocating what tasks are to be done at work, does your Boss compromise and let you off from doing the tasks that you don't wish to do? I bet the answer is no! Look at it the same way. You set the rents, they pay. Simple as that. If they don't like it they can move elsewhere.I guess it is always important to keep a good relationship with the tenant and to come to some type of compromise when it comes to situations like this,
Why on earth would the tenant get a say? Owning rental properties is a Business. Does your Electricty company have to justify to you why they are putting up prices? NO! It is a commercial enterprise, entered into for profit exactly the same as having IPs, except on a much larger scale.Yes i believe the tenant should have a say, but if the landlord can justify the reasons for the increase and not just for the purpose of lining his/her pockets then both parties should be able to come to an agreement.
OPM = Other People's Money. I first heard the term n that funny Danny De Vito movie I can't think of right now.
What if you used a Line of Credit to pay the investment shortfall not your own Pay As You Go salary.... This LOC would go up, meaning you used your cpaital, but not your cashflow.
That was my immediate thought too.
Compromise? I never compromise. When allocating what tasks are to be done at work, does your Boss compromise and let you off from doing the tasks that you don't wish to do? I bet the answer is no! Look at it the same way. You set the rents, they pay. Simple as that. If they don't like it they can move elsewhere.
Why on earth would the tenant get a say? Owning rental properties is a Business. Does your Electricty company have to justify to you why they are putting up prices? NO! It is a commercial enterprise, entered into for profit exactly the same as having IPs, except on a much larger scale.
I think you need to ask yourself why you decided to invest in property. Did you do it for your own benefit and wellbeing? To help or fully fund your retirement? To give you or your family a better lifestyle in years to come? OR did you do it to help and assist someone else. To provide a low cost roof over the head(s) of someone in need. To personally help fund their lifestyle and allow them to either live in a better home or neighbourhood than they could otherwise afford, or to allow them to have the funds to pay for those little extras in life that they could not do without your help?
I know exactly why I invest in property.
Real Estate manager told me if I put it up to much the tenant can complain to consumer affairs and the consumer affairs investigate if the rent is fair or not.
interest on your PPR?
Then what happens in event of an audit? The money was taken out of the LOC for personal use (if using the above scenario), if that LOC was used for investment purposes, you've just messed your tax accounting up.
Now, Rixter got all complicated with his calcs but I'm going to keep it simple, cause I'm a simple kinda girl.
If you increase the rent by $20 and this brings it in line with the market, there is no problem. Let them complain. I hardly think that consumer affairs would be in any position to make a decision as to the fair rental value of your particular property to within $10...
The concept is simple - its just people's perception of it that complicates things.
dumpster, with respect, I think this one sentence reflects two errors commonly made when deciding what rent to ask. It's nonsensical to have a fixed amount by which you 'usually' raise rent, and irrelevant to refer to your increasing holding costs.I tried to put up my rent by $20 a week as I normally put it up $10 but wanted to recoup the increased costs I am experiencing from the tenant.
dumpster, with respect, I think this one sentence reflects two errors commonly made when deciding what rent to ask. It's nonsensical to have a fixed amount by which you 'usually' raise rent, and irrelevant to refer to your increasing holding costs.
The only thing that's relevant is market rental for your property at that time.
LMAO!!!!hehehe...you said "dumpster"!!