Hi all,
I’m trying to get my head around how equity it used, and how it affects the property from which it is pulled from.
Let’s say I’ve purchased a PPOR for 400k (100k deposit, 300k loan), and for arguments sake ignore purchase costs and assume I have an IO loan and I’m not paying off any principle.
Three years later, the house is now worth 500k.
Equity in PPOR = 500k – 300k = 200k
From what I understand I can borrow 80% (closer to 90% if I’m willing to pay LMI) of the property from my available equity.
Max Borrowing (assuming 80%) = (500k * 0.80) – 300k = 100k
I can borrow this 100k to invest in an IP, by using it as the deposit for another property. The remaining value of the property will be a loan with a different institution/bank.
A few questions
I’m trying to get my head around how equity it used, and how it affects the property from which it is pulled from.
Let’s say I’ve purchased a PPOR for 400k (100k deposit, 300k loan), and for arguments sake ignore purchase costs and assume I have an IO loan and I’m not paying off any principle.
Three years later, the house is now worth 500k.
Equity in PPOR = 500k – 300k = 200k
From what I understand I can borrow 80% (closer to 90% if I’m willing to pay LMI) of the property from my available equity.
Max Borrowing (assuming 80%) = (500k * 0.80) – 300k = 100k
I can borrow this 100k to invest in an IP, by using it as the deposit for another property. The remaining value of the property will be a loan with a different institution/bank.
A few questions
- What has happened to my PPOR loan? Do I now owe them 400k (300k loan + 100k borrowed from equity)? Will my interest repayments increase as a result?
- How much equity SHOULD I be taking out? Is it best to take as little as possible (ie; 5-10% of the purchase price of the IP plus purchase costs), and increase the loan resulting in higher tax benefits.