Hi there. I am wondering if anyone has put thought into whether or not external "retro-fitted" water tanks actually add rental income value, or capital value?
Scenario:
Existing IP - smallish block of land 3BR, DLUG, Logan area (South East QLD)
Added garden, fence - upped the rent to compensate.
Added A/c on (now gone) tenant request - and negotiated a rent rise to pay off the a/c units.
(rent stayed up too because the units stayed.
Water Tank (not plumbed): Does anyone have experience as to whether they add value to rental income?
Plumbed? Any experience on rental increase VS potential costs of maintenance?
Second Scenario: Currently being Built IP, Southern Bayside.
Was approved before the new rules about mandatory tanks.
Any experience out there?
Scenario:
Existing IP - smallish block of land 3BR, DLUG, Logan area (South East QLD)
Added garden, fence - upped the rent to compensate.
Added A/c on (now gone) tenant request - and negotiated a rent rise to pay off the a/c units.
(rent stayed up too because the units stayed.
Water Tank (not plumbed): Does anyone have experience as to whether they add value to rental income?
Plumbed? Any experience on rental increase VS potential costs of maintenance?
Second Scenario: Currently being Built IP, Southern Bayside.
Was approved before the new rules about mandatory tanks.
Any experience out there?