yep, sure is!
when I spoke to a few REA, they were all saying "well this property we have here, the yield is almost 4% which is quite good", which at the time was quite good, I frequently saw properties that were yielding say 3.25%-3.9%, and this seemed to be the norm.
however, in todays market, I was just curious what the sort of yield we can expect. I was looking at south yarra, and I saw a property in the same block, which was yielding 4.7% based on an auction result....
so if the current rate was 7.5% then that is a deficit of 2.8%.
my questions to the experts out there.. is this a good yield in todays markets??
R/E gents love to say this, and I bet if you asked them; "well, are you going to buy it if the yield is so good?" they'd say no.
The yield is what it is.
I'm a cashflow investor first, cap growth second, so a 5% yield is never going to be "good" to me. I can control the cashflow when the purchase is made, but I can't control the cap growth. I can only hope it is good, and try to make some educated guesses that it will be good. But what if it isn't?
If the deficit is way below the interest rate on the loan, then you are going to be tied to supporting that property with earned income dollars for a very long time unless you have a massive cash deposit to start you off.
"Established" areas seem to always yield around 5% in good times and drop away when there is a price spike. They don't seem to go much higher than this generally; maybe for a brief period, but then back down, and the agents then feel justified in saying what they say.
That doesn't mean there will continued, steady growth with it either, and you could be left with a long period of little growth and lots of neg cashflow.
Bugger that; there are plenty of other areas that will return a much better yield, and can deliver decent growth that aren't "established". Why not have both, and some decent depreciation along the way for extra cashflow?
You just have to find them, and they are out there.
People usually go for established because it is easier and supposedly better for growth long term, and the trade-off is neg cashflow.
If you are doing the IP thing to set up a retirement nest-egg way off in the future and are willing to keep working to support the circus, then that's fine, but if you are doing it to exit the rat-race much earlier, this probably won't do it for you - especially in this current climate if the house prices stop rising for a few years