It was Johns book '7 Steps' that got me into property investing.
I haven't purchased a property through them, but did source finance from InvestLoan. I've since moved on to a better deal.
Does anyone else think this is kinda stupid:
"I recently valued two John Fitzgerald properties which the people had bought in 1999 for a total of $380,000 which are now worth $680,000," McGeever said. "But if they had spent $380,000 in (the Brisbane suburb of) Red Hill in 1999 they could have bought a four-bedroom, two-bathroom family home on an 800sqm block which would now be worth $1.4 million."
Yeah, and if they had have bought a lotto ticket with the numbers 12, 23, 44, 32, 22 and 11 they would have done quite well also.
At a guess I'd say that Red Hill place would be wildly different in terms of cashflow (lower yield plus nil depreciation vs higher yield and new house depreciation) and higher maintenance on an older property. They might not have even been able to hold it for all we know.
The investors have almost doubled their money in less than 10 years. IMO that's not a bad result. Of course a better result was possible elsewhere. This almost always will be the case with any investment decision. Was this something that the average person should have reasonably known back in 1999? If they had not of had any dealings with JFG would have they bought the Red Hill place instead?
JFG has made money from me however I don't have a huge problem with it. He provides a service and tries to make a buck at the same time. I don't feel he is being unethical about it. I'm looking forward to seeing what Neil has to write about him in Stitched.
If it wasn't for his John's first book I don't think I'd be in the position I am in now. It was published back in a time when you had to look in the business section for the small handful of books that were available on Australian Real Estate Investing. They didn't have there own whole section like they do today.