It seems like we're going into circular conversations in this thread, with the same arguments re-hashed again and again.
As far as I can tell, you can choose either for fixed rates if you need predictability, or for variable rates if you prefer to have more flexibility and lower rates over the long term.
You can debate whether now is the right time to lock in a long-term rates for as long as you want. At the end, it makes not much difference. Nobody really knows what's coming up ahead. Those who have fixed their rate don't really care. Those who are on variable rates hope that variable rates won't go up too soon.
As far as I am concerned, I have fixed half of my debt for 10 years. I don't really know whether I picked the low point in the cycle. I know that, at that rate, the properties will be cash-flow positive for the next 10 years. So I can go on chasing other deals without having to worry about what might happen when interest rates go up.
The point of this being, what matters is not what might happen to interest rates, but what your strategy is and whether fixed or variable rates suit your strategy. Variable rates is a lot more flexible, there is no break fee. But it comes at a cost of higher volatility, meaning higher risk.
The question is not which is better but which one do you prefer. It's a matter of taste.
Cheers,
As far as I can tell, you can choose either for fixed rates if you need predictability, or for variable rates if you prefer to have more flexibility and lower rates over the long term.
You can debate whether now is the right time to lock in a long-term rates for as long as you want. At the end, it makes not much difference. Nobody really knows what's coming up ahead. Those who have fixed their rate don't really care. Those who are on variable rates hope that variable rates won't go up too soon.
As far as I am concerned, I have fixed half of my debt for 10 years. I don't really know whether I picked the low point in the cycle. I know that, at that rate, the properties will be cash-flow positive for the next 10 years. So I can go on chasing other deals without having to worry about what might happen when interest rates go up.
The point of this being, what matters is not what might happen to interest rates, but what your strategy is and whether fixed or variable rates suit your strategy. Variable rates is a lot more flexible, there is no break fee. But it comes at a cost of higher volatility, meaning higher risk.
The question is not which is better but which one do you prefer. It's a matter of taste.
Cheers,