Rixter, can you explain a bit further? My partner and I are in the process of looking for a place and are facing this conundrum now. Our budget is $450 which means either an apartment around Lane Cove etc or a house around Riverstone, Quakers Hill etc.
My take on what Rixter is saying is you really need to define your end goal and select the most appropriate property based on this. It's the old saying 'start with the end in mind'
A lot of newer investors will start by thinking 'ok, i've got 500k to spend, what sort of property should i buy?' without fully considering how this property will fit into their overall investing goals.
Once you define your strategy, the type of property you want to buy will become much more clear and this will narrow down your selection criteria significantly.
For example, an end goal strategy may be 'I want to acquire $2million worth of residential property over the next 10 years which will provide long term capital growth of 7% per annum that will be cash flow neutral'.
From this, you can then start looking for that type of property in suburbs that will meet your end goal, You may break it into smaller steps - by looking for 5x $400k properties in suburbs that have had long term capital growth of over 7% for the last 10-20 years, that have yields of 6-7%+.
Another example, 'I want to acquire 3x development sites over the next 5 years, which will allow me to value add by subdividing and developing 3 townhouses on each site'.
From this, you can start looking for properties with enough land content to develop 3 townhouses, in areas you can currently afford.
Starting with the end in mind will allow you to get your property selection right from the very start, rather than just buying whatever you can afford at the time, without really thinking about how this fits in with your overall strategy. The starting point, of course, is to define your strategy and end goal.