ATO attempts to close another loop hole re PPOR ownership thru trusts

Taxpayer Alerts
Home Loan Unit Trust Arrangement


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Taxpayer Alert describes an arrangement where a taxpayer and/or spouse use a unit trust to acquire a property for their residential use in an attempt to access tax deductions generally available to investment properties. In essence, the arrangement appears to be about seeking deductions for essentially private expenditure.

DESCRIPTION



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The alert applies to arrangements having the following features.

1.
The taxpayer and/or spouse establishes a unit trust with a company as trustee. The taxpayer and/or spouse initially acquire a small number of units in the trust. The taxpayer and/or spouse are the directors of the trustee company.
2.
The taxpayer borrows an amount of money that approximates the value of a yet to be acquired residential property and uses the borrowings to acquire more units in the trust. The trust gives a guarantee to the lender over the taxpayer's borrowings.
3.
The unit trust then purchases a residence that is leased to the taxpayer and/or spouse at market rental with annual rent reviews. The trust grants a mortgage over the residence to the lender as security for the taxpayer's borrowings. In some cases the term of the lease is for 50 years.
4.
Subsequently, the taxpayer and/or spouse pay rent to the trust under the lease. The trust pays the expenses on the property such as water and council rates and insurance. The trust claims deductions for those expenses and also claims any depreciation or other capital allowance deductions that apply in respect of investment properties.
5.
The trust's taxable income is distributed to the unit holders. The taxpayer, as the major unit-holder, receives most of this distribution and it is included in his or her tax return as assessable income.
6.
The taxpayer claims deductions against that income for the interest that is paid on the borrowings used to acquire the units in the trust. This results in an overall loss from the arrangement to the taxpayer that is offset against other income.
FEATURES WHICH THE ATO CONSIDERS GIVE RISE TO TAXATION ISSUES



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(a)
The arrangement seems artificial and lacking commerciality in its design and execution.
(b)
It would seem that the arrangement may have the dominant purpose of enabling deductions to be claimed for essentially private expenditure.
(c)
The arrangement raises questions about the deductibility of interest expenses under general provisions.
(d)
The arrangement raises questions about the application of the general anti-avoidance provisions of Part IVA of the ITAA 1936.
The Australian Taxation Office is examining these arrangements.
 
Isn't it interesting that the ATO don't bother mentioning the fact that if the property is sold, they will now be entitled to Capital Gains Tax, won't they? Surely a trust or company cannot claim such a property as a PPOR?

So, isn't this a case of what one hand giveth, the other taketh away? Of course this depends on selling, and of course it may not be as lucrative for the ATO, either, since CGT depends on capital growth, whereas the trust as "purchaser" gains the deduction irrespective.
 
maybe i should clarify - the topic may of lead to some confusion as to what the article is about....


you cant buy a property which you wish to live in through a trust and then rent it back through the trust
 
I have a question.

It says that it is a "Unit Trust".
Does that mean it is okay to do a similar thing through a "Discretionary Trust"???

I know they are similar setups, but you can't do the above if you have a Discretionary Trust, though it would be very similar.

Still new to the whole Trust thing so any info/insights would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Adam.
 
I think the key points which would be relevant to that are these :

(a)
The arrangement seems artificial and lacking commerciality in its design and execution.
(b)
It would seem that the arrangement may have the dominant purpose of enabling deductions to be claimed for essentially private expenditure.

These would apply to any structure.... in this case either UT/Disc/Hybrid where you were trying to rent back your PPOR in order to gain a tax deduction....

The real question is this.... how do we justify that we have a commercial reason for sturucturing in this manner ?

Some thoughts - asset protection..... hrmmm extensive list so far hey :p
 
Lets think on that one.

How about we pay commercial rents with annualised CPI growth written into the contract. Plus lets make the contract for 5 years.

Then we go to a Real Estate Agency and say, how would you like to earn the easiest 3-5% commission on a rental property.

You get them to draw up the contracts, you have direct debiting to the RE Agency who then make the monthly payments to your trust.

Any in the Trusts contract to the RE Agency you place into it that they never have to do an inspection, nor call the tenants, nor pay any bills (well actually you could get them to pay your council rates and stuff if you really wanted to) they simply have to pass monies through their books and take a bit for themselves in the mean time.

Does this then cross the boarders as being a commercial deal?

What is everyones thoughts???

Cheers
Robert
 
Unfortunately it doesnt matter if the rent is at market levels or not... you still need to have a commercial reason other than tax minimisation to structure your affairs in this way :/

Off to read investors link
:)
 
Hi all - this interests me - what if the company purchases 2 propeties, and rents one out as a commercial 'going concern', and the directors live in the other? or how about 3 properties, or 4?
Is this enough of a reason to set this structure up?
It actually looks very much like a wrappers' / lease-optioners' ideal setup - (throw in a home office from which the wrapping business runs, and other costs before profit).
Any further ideas?

ShaunW
 
Originally posted by XBenX
Unfortunately it doesnt matter if the rent is at market levels or not... you still need to have a commercial reason other than tax minimisation to structure your affairs in this way :/

Off to read investors link
:)

Would asset protection be considered a commercial reason?
 
Originally posted by XBenX
I

Some thoughts - asset protection..... hrmmm extensive list so far hey :p

i think you need more than that - but thats a flat out guess :) - I was hoping for ppl to thnk of some more commercial reasons other than asset protection.

I havent thought of anymore yet.... but then again I have been devoting all of my time to dragging myself out of this large large hole in the ground that I dug for myself on NYE/NYD :)
 
Back
Top