I'm interested in people's opinions on the following scenario:
This afternoon for interest sake, I went to the auction of a 2BR duplex a few doors up the street from where I purchased my PPOR at auction 6 months ago. It's in an inner city area SA and I love the location.
The place up for auction was tastefully renovated, but the downside was it was positioned between 2 rather dingy blocks of units. About 4 units units on each side of the property with the back doors of the units facing her outdoor living area along one side of the house.
Anyway, the auction got under way, but there were only 2 registered bidders.
No one made any bids, so the agent put in a vendor bid. at $450k. Not long after, a young woman made a bid at $455k. (That in itself seemed to be a mistake as the auctioneer never announced 'it was on the market'.)
The agent then went in to chat to the owners. On coming back out he spoke privately with the bidder, her mother and several of her excited female friends. Agent went back in the house to talk to the owners. He came out once again and called for final bids. This time, much to my surprise the same buyer put in a second bid at $475k and secured the property.
Am I right to think she was crazy to bid at all in this situation? Let alone increase her offer by $20k?
I am interested in people's thoughts about such a scenario?
Seems to me she overpaid by 20 odd grand.
Would she have been better off not to bid at all and negotiate privately after the auction? As clearly there were no other bids on the day?
It seemed like she was bidding against herself. In my opinion she paid too much for a place that, while nicely renovated and in a good inner city location is poorly positioned between 2 blocks of units.
Thoughts?
This afternoon for interest sake, I went to the auction of a 2BR duplex a few doors up the street from where I purchased my PPOR at auction 6 months ago. It's in an inner city area SA and I love the location.
The place up for auction was tastefully renovated, but the downside was it was positioned between 2 rather dingy blocks of units. About 4 units units on each side of the property with the back doors of the units facing her outdoor living area along one side of the house.
Anyway, the auction got under way, but there were only 2 registered bidders.
No one made any bids, so the agent put in a vendor bid. at $450k. Not long after, a young woman made a bid at $455k. (That in itself seemed to be a mistake as the auctioneer never announced 'it was on the market'.)
The agent then went in to chat to the owners. On coming back out he spoke privately with the bidder, her mother and several of her excited female friends. Agent went back in the house to talk to the owners. He came out once again and called for final bids. This time, much to my surprise the same buyer put in a second bid at $475k and secured the property.
Am I right to think she was crazy to bid at all in this situation? Let alone increase her offer by $20k?
I am interested in people's thoughts about such a scenario?
Seems to me she overpaid by 20 odd grand.
Would she have been better off not to bid at all and negotiate privately after the auction? As clearly there were no other bids on the day?
It seemed like she was bidding against herself. In my opinion she paid too much for a place that, while nicely renovated and in a good inner city location is poorly positioned between 2 blocks of units.
Thoughts?