Heck, even The Australian Financial Review appears to have taken an entirely somber view about the Australian residential property sector.
Robert Harley, writing the influential Chanticleer column (Tony Boyd is on leave), yesterday stated “nearly every housing indicator in the country is pointing down. New housing finance is 30% below the first home frenzy of 2009. Housing sales have dropped, with leading Ray White Real Estate recording a 16% decline in the value of houses last month…at the same time, the number of houses and apartments for sale has soared.”
Boyd then pointed out the first link in the vicious cycle of a bursting bubble: “Price growth has evaporated. In Brisbane and Perth, prices are in decline. On the Gold Coast, the Sunshine Coast and Cairns, the decline has turned into a rout.”
Today, Ben Hurley in the AFR noted “Australia’s wealthiest investors have lost interest in residential property, speaking a sell-down that could keep property markets weak for years to come”.
Currently, the net return (after all expenses) on residential property is around 2%
That may be a good return if the “risk free” rate (a good proxy of which is government bonds) is zero. Currently, the risk-free rate is around 5% — more than double net rental yields. Property returns are even worse when you consider the substantial entry and exit fees (often around 10% of the price).
That means, a risky asset like property (which can go down in price as well as rise) is yielding less than an asset which is guaranteed by all taxpayers.
Is there any substance to this story?
cheers
Here's the story in full http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/14/the-house-bubble-is-popping-even-the-afr-agrees/
Robert Harley, writing the influential Chanticleer column (Tony Boyd is on leave), yesterday stated “nearly every housing indicator in the country is pointing down. New housing finance is 30% below the first home frenzy of 2009. Housing sales have dropped, with leading Ray White Real Estate recording a 16% decline in the value of houses last month…at the same time, the number of houses and apartments for sale has soared.”
Boyd then pointed out the first link in the vicious cycle of a bursting bubble: “Price growth has evaporated. In Brisbane and Perth, prices are in decline. On the Gold Coast, the Sunshine Coast and Cairns, the decline has turned into a rout.”
Today, Ben Hurley in the AFR noted “Australia’s wealthiest investors have lost interest in residential property, speaking a sell-down that could keep property markets weak for years to come”.
Currently, the net return (after all expenses) on residential property is around 2%
That may be a good return if the “risk free” rate (a good proxy of which is government bonds) is zero. Currently, the risk-free rate is around 5% — more than double net rental yields. Property returns are even worse when you consider the substantial entry and exit fees (often around 10% of the price).
That means, a risky asset like property (which can go down in price as well as rise) is yielding less than an asset which is guaranteed by all taxpayers.
Is there any substance to this story?
cheers
Here's the story in full http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/14/the-house-bubble-is-popping-even-the-afr-agrees/