Australian Developer Contributions & Governments Role in Affordability
Developer contributions have been a sore point & a hot topic in Australia for many years.
If you look closely you will discover a key driver to the supply issue of new housing is state & local government taxes & contributions. Governments are heavily reliant on collecting various property taxes to fund their administration & community programs.
Real Estate demand is a function of supply at a specific price; the higher the price the lower the demand. So its not surprising that with the large amount of taxes & contributions that Australia has an affordability issue & major housing shortages in many parts of Australia.
If fees & taxes were reduced there would be more affordable development that would reduce the residential undersupply, increase building employment, reduce community issues relating to affordability & produce more fee & tax transactions for governments.
Currently NSW is one of the most expensive places to develop in terms of average developer contributions (Infrastructure & Sec 94) at around $35k per new lot. WA comes in second at around $25k per lot, followed by Qld. Vic sits around $19k, so its not surprising that things are going well in that state.
Most Local Government Areas will give you an indication of developer contributions over the phone or have the information it posted on their websites.
When you do your feasibility it is essential that include all your costs including developer contributions & taxes, fees & holding costs. The number of projects that I’ve seen that had a feasibility done on the back of a beer coaster is staggering. Maybe beer coaster feasibilities’ are OK for some in a rising market, but they are never a good way to manage your risk.
As a result of these government payments many developers have had to become more creative in their offerings, in a effort to reduce costs. Smaller lot sizes, higher density, smaller unit size, less parking, maintaining an existing residence, less expensive construction, faster planning, quicker build time etc can be important in reducing costs.
Bottom line however is that if governments want to stimulate more development & employment while addressing the affordability issue then they must look at reducing their property & development fees & taxes.
Philip