A few points for Sean
Why have 2 trustees? This means double the risk. I would use one if possible.
Preferably a company trustee for added protection. I disagree with Rolf too, the assets of a trust are not personal property of the trustee and so do not form part of their estate and are protected from creditors if the individual goes bankrupt - but there are some exceptions.
Having a company as trustee will make lending a little bit harder.
Since in QLD there is no stamp duty on trusts (is this still the case?) why not just have 1 trust per property? It will only cost you another trust deed, and a little bit of accounting each year, but it will be so more flexible. You could each be trustee of one trust - while both appointors on both trusts.
Why have 2 trustees? This means double the risk. I would use one if possible.
Preferably a company trustee for added protection. I disagree with Rolf too, the assets of a trust are not personal property of the trustee and so do not form part of their estate and are protected from creditors if the individual goes bankrupt - but there are some exceptions.
Having a company as trustee will make lending a little bit harder.
Since in QLD there is no stamp duty on trusts (is this still the case?) why not just have 1 trust per property? It will only cost you another trust deed, and a little bit of accounting each year, but it will be so more flexible. You could each be trustee of one trust - while both appointors on both trusts.