Does anyone know why banks insist on having us sign two copies of the mortgage? I get that they will lodge one and want to keep a copy, but why do they insist on that copy also being an original? Surely a photocopy would be sufficient for their records. Do they think they may need to lodge the copy sometime in the future?
Also, why do banks (or at lease the bank I'm dealing with) think it is OK to send me a blank mortgage (as the title hadn't been issued when they sent the loan docs), ask me to sign it and then they will replace/fill out the front page with the title details afterwards? What they end up lodging isn't the document I signed. Surely there has to be some question marks over the legitimacy of this practice, and what is stopping them including the title details over any property I own on the front page and then lodging that?
I'm in WA to the extent practice differs between states.
Also, why do banks (or at lease the bank I'm dealing with) think it is OK to send me a blank mortgage (as the title hadn't been issued when they sent the loan docs), ask me to sign it and then they will replace/fill out the front page with the title details afterwards? What they end up lodging isn't the document I signed. Surely there has to be some question marks over the legitimacy of this practice, and what is stopping them including the title details over any property I own on the front page and then lodging that?
I'm in WA to the extent practice differs between states.