Early retirement

Strange how my LOE strategy is still providing finance then.




What area did you buy in and is it considered an affluent suburb (top end) or middleclass Joe Average suburb?
From your stats given my guess is top end where there is less people who can afford and/or rent compared to middle class where the masses lay.




Different ways from a investment strategy view.

Rixter, So the issues Daazz speaks of are not "real" ?

Please help us understand your short phrases a bit more in depth so we can also understand what you are suggesting.......
 
Rixter, So the issues Daazz speaks of are not "real" ?
Im sure they are real for him otherwise he wouldnt be making the comment.

His way of accessing income from his portfolio is different to mine.

My experience with drawing LOE funds aka Navra style suggests otherwise. My lenders are still providing me funds because I jump the DSR & LVR hoops they require.
 
Yeah righteo cheers..



So it soudns like ONE had better prepare pretty darn well for it to work for them or else we could end up like Dazz foudn where the banks wont' give us money...

Hmmmm this would probably be the interesting & unanswerable juicy bit of information / knolwedge one needs.

Oh well, probably nothing I'll ever have to worry about anyway
 
My experience with drawing LOE funds aka Navra style suggests otherwise. My lenders are still providing me funds because I jump the DSR & LVR hoops they require.

Rixter,

Is this because you still have a day job with a regular income?
 
Work 3 days weekl and manufacture the remainder of income required to meet DSR from rental & existing portfolio equity.

Rixter, so if you weren't working 3 days, would you still be able to do it ???

We're not trying to bag your plan or technique, we're trying to understand how things can be done or if they can be done.
 
Rixter, so if you weren't working 3 days, would you still be able to do it ???

Yes, providing I show my lenders the income level they need to see for the top up amounts I require. It's a matter finding out what they need to see then providing it to them.

I will continue to trade my time for money until we reach our required portfolio/equity base level to sustain our ideal lifestyle income.
 
Yes, providing I show my lenders the income level they need to see for the top up amounts I require. It's a matter finding out what they need to see then providing it to them.

I will continue to trade my time for money until we reach our required portfolio/equity base level to sustain our ideal lifestyle income.

Cool.

Now to try & work out what all that really means in actual terms compared to Dazz's example of it not working out in order to understand a bit better the options we have available to us...


How ? NFI of course
 
Now to try & work out what all that really means in actual terms in order to understand a bit better the options we have available to us...

JC,

I imagine more than few punters are in that boat. One person who frequents this board who "made it" successfully with ressy is Chris.

She's got a decent swag under her belt, and I believe most of it is unencumbered, so has a whale of a time doing what she wants when she wants.

Perhaps send her a polite PM asking how she did it. I'd hazard a guess it wasn't accomplished in a decade or two. Reading some of her posts, it's a fully funded capitally growing retirement, but it wasn't an "early retirement", as the original post is getting at.
 
JC,

I imagine more than few punters are in that boat. One person who frequents this board who "made it" successfully with ressy is Chris.

She's got a decent swag under her belt, and I believe most of it is unencumbered, so has a whale of a time doing what she wants when she wants.

Perhaps send her a polite PM asking how she did it. I'd hazard a guess it wasn't accomplished in a decade or two. Reading some of her posts, it's a fully funded capitally growing retirement, but it wasn't an "early retirement", as the original post is getting at.

Yeah cheers Dazz.

I know nothing will give us a step by step, just trying to understanad where the convo you / Rixter brought up aobut LOE/difficulties of LOE might have led to etc a bit better since it seemed the 2 views were a qutie a bit different.

Sometimes I talk too much. Perhaps if I'd let the conversaton keep going instead of trying to clarify the question, which as you point out, may not be the right one in the first place... Or perhaps I'm too curious for curiosity's sake - I don't even know if my attempts will fall over like a house of cards after an unexpected wind of unexpected issues.. anwyway.....

Your description of Chris' capitally growing retirment example reminded me in some way of Jan Somers' book etc. That wasn't early retirement either... I don't think it was exhorbitant either.

When I do numbers myself, starting where I am & sayng "what if I did nothing else for 10 yrs, how woudl it look then ?" (of course, I assume growth /rent/expenses will rise by what I calculate which may not be accurate at all but hey, what do you do right ?).. then I've said "what if I bought this & later did that"

At the end of the day, I come up with various scenarios, but one thing they all have in common is (sides the assumptions I made which I already talked about), is it seems that they hinge on decisions / rules which I have no control over.
 
Last edited:
Nowadays, the place is worth 1.4m, and it is struggling to attract anyone willing to pay $ 700 pw. That's a gross yield of 2.6%.

Considering the huge CG I'd sell it asap because its price will probably pull back to the long term average
 
Considering the huge CG I'd sell it asap because its price will probably pull back to the long term average

With a value of $1.4 (top end market) and the current state of that market I'd say its already attained its correction .
 
With a value of $1.4 (top end market) and the current state of that market I'd say its already pulled back to the long term average.

I think he paid $400K 12 years ago so unless it is a very unique property I'd imagine it has heaps of room for correction
 
I think he paid $400K 12 years ago so unless it is a very unique property I'd imagine it has heaps of room for correction

I dont think you realise the magnitude of growth thats been sustained across Perth, and particularly more in some suburbs, in the last decade +.
 
Yeah cheers Dazz.

I know nothing will give us a step by step, just trying to understanad where the convo you / Rixter brought up aobut LOE/difficulties of LOE might have led to etc a bit better since it seemed the 2 views were a qutie a bit different.

Sometimes I talk too much. Perhaps if I'd let the conversaton keep going instead of trying to clarify the question, which as you point out, may not be the right one in the first place... Or perhaps I'm too curious for curiosity's sake - I don't even know if my attempts will fall over like a house of cards after an unexpected wind of unexpected issues.. anwyway.....

Your description of Chris' capitally growing retirment example reminded me in some way of Jan Somers' book etc. That wasn't early retirement either... I don't think it was exhorbitant either.

When I do numbers myself, starting where I am & sayng "what if I did nothing else for 10 yrs, how woudl it look then ?" (of course, I assume growth /rent/expenses will rise by what I calculate which may not be accurate at all but hey, what do you do right ?).. then I've said "what if I bought this & later did that"

At the end of the day, I come up with various scenarios, but one thing they all have in common is (sides the assumptions I made which I already talked about), is it seems that they hinge on decisions / rules which I have no control over.

Jaycee,

There is a really good book called the 'Property Puzzle' written by Stuart Wemyss. In his book he gives examples (complete with figures) of how many resi properties investors need to be able to retire by a certain age. (Early retirement). He compares the capital growth strategy with the positive cashflow strategy. It is a good read and gives some good strategies/ideas. Of course his examples are based on a number of assumptions etc which can never be guaranteed to be accurate!!

Regards Jason.
 
As usual, I agree with Rixter, and disagree with Dazz. But ina good way, everyone is different and I appreciate those differences.
Main reason being that not using equity profits to me seems silly.
It could at least be used to reduce debt, but either way: unused equity is
just waste if it's not used to increase your wealth..

I've been partially LOE for the pst 2 years without any problems at all.
 
I've been partially LOE for the pst 2 years without any problems at all.

We also have been doing so. We don't have a lot of property but enough to allow hubby to work if he wants, or not...

We won't ever be tripping off in our own jet, but that is not something we aspire to anyway.
 
I've been partially LOE for the pst 2 years without any problems at all.

I plan on living for longer than 2 years, though.

My issue is whether LOE is viable long term. My opinion is that if you have enough to LOE long term, you also have enough to switch to LOR, and LOR is less risky than LOE because you're less dependent on bank lending rules. I'm not willing to accept the risk of LOE'ing for, say, 10 years, and then find I can't do it anymore because the bank won't let me access my equity. And in the meantime I've lost all my earning ability.
 
I'm not willing to accept the risk of LOE'ing for, say, 10 years, and then find I can't do it anymore because the bank won't let me access my equity.

How do you know the bank wont let you access your equity? If you meet their lending DSR & LVR requirements why wouldnt they let you?

Seems like your issue isnt they wont let you access it, rather, you dont know how you are going to meet their lending module.

Could you research more down that path and maybe that will help open up new horizons ?
 
How do you know the bank wont let you access your equity? If you meet their lending DSR & LVR requirements why wouldnt they let you?

Seems like your issue isnt they wont let you access it, rather, you dont know how you are going to meet their lending module.

Could you research more down that path and maybe that will help open up new horizons ?

Fair enough. At my age and stage of life, though, I'm not willing to take the risk.
 
Back
Top