Never heard of them.
BTW in regards to the 10% quote before, it is not THAT shocking considering that you are talking a low-end property, so the agent isn't taken much dollar-wise. Consider this with the hassle for the area, its premium you pay.
I do know of property managers charging around 8% though full service iirc for normal stock.
I also know of property managers who charge 4%, but that's for properties in Medindie and Toorak Gardens!
I agree. 9% sounds a lot, but for a low end property its not much. I imagine if you are getting peanuts for managing a low end property, the amount of attention you can afford to give it is minimal.
I'd rather pay 9% and get it managed properly and get a better tenant and service than save $25 a month to get a property manager who has to take on so many more properties to make it worth his while that he can't give my property any attention.
Of course, this assumes that you get decent service for the extra couple of percent.
I find it one of the ironies of the property management fee structure that the properties that are probably the easiest to manage (once let) are probably the ones that you pay the most for in terms of the management fee.
Whereas the lower end properties generate far less revenue for the agent, but probably cause far more work.
Murphy