who said Perth was dead?
hows this for a value add?
- Thread starter Aaron Sice
- Start date
it's in Mount Lawley.
it's churning upwards of 30% profit.
it's churning upwards of 30% profit.
email me.....!
How to get this through council?
Hi Aaron,
For a development like this that isn't even close to what the zoning rules say for site coverage (and likely setbacks also), what is the secret to successfully getting a DA? It seems like a license to print money if you know how to work this system.
Thanks,
Matt
Hi Aaron,
For a development like this that isn't even close to what the zoning rules say for site coverage (and likely setbacks also), what is the secret to successfully getting a DA? It seems like a license to print money if you know how to work this system.
Thanks,
Matt
How long will it take to complete?
setbacks are perfect.
density is ambiguous because it's next to commercial.
you need to understand the intent behind the town planning schemes - that's the secret.
unfortunately, most people don't.
once DA approved, should be 6-7 months turn key with the panel system it's designed for.
there'll be better deals yet to come.
Depends on the orientation of the block. But any architect worth his salt knows that light must be maximised in any building in order for the development to sell well. Windows facing north - or alternatively, lightwells throughout the building to redirect light into the apartments.
Having said that though, in 'off the plan' sales you might get away with it since no one can actually see the building until it's built. So if it saves you money not to do these kind of things, then I suppose it's OK to leave it out.
what? BCA states minimums for light and ventilation - it's not a planning issue at all.....?
the site is orientated to capitalise on the city views.
we don't need "North sun" when North of the 33rd parallel. the issue in Perth is keeping the heat OUT, not getting it in for those 6 weeks of the year when we have to wear a singlet under our cardigans.
not really - it meets the intent of local planning policy.
the've just approved one up the road that has a maximum density of 0.7 and it's through at 2.0
Do people not mind the 2.4 ceilings?
