Is there a doctor in the house?

Without wishing to hijack the “imagration” thread. (the winner of “best unintentional irony award” for thread titles this year). I really feel the medical side-issue running thru deserves its own thread.

The Rural doctor issue is complex and the importation of foreign doctors is a short term fix.

Rural doctors are a dying breed and the skill set required is absolutely enormous. They are on call 24/7, they have to make do without easy access to labs, XRs, and professional support. They treat from the womb to the tomb,. Very few want their jobs so they are the ones up for grabs from foreign trained

QLD Junior doctors are sent out from their second year onwards to do a country relieving term to relieve the stressed, overworked Medicos. It’s always a source of stress to them despite attempts by the parent hospitals to reinforce basic skills such as plastering, suturing and emergency care. It isn’t the best introduction, Most feel very uncomfortable during their time.

The medical students all come from universities where they study for 5-7 years (as all med students now are post grad), all the unis are coastal major metropolitan centres. So at the end of their training they are late 20s-early 30s with spouses, parallel carreers, kids + lives centred in the metropolitan areas. I would change the emphasis WW puts on metro raised females …all docs are metro-trained- for years and years!

James Cook Uni and some medical colleges like emergency medicine, are focusing more on the rural aspect but the social isolation problems will always remain.

Are we “stealing” third world doctors? Yes! They are ALREADY trained they aren’t looking for more education, they are looking for a better life. And why shouldn’t they? It’s the right of humanity to want more for their kids and themselves.

The problem is, the individual docs do whats best for them…. But the home country suffers brain drain, should the wishes of the individual supersede the rights of the nation that trained them? It’s the prisoners dilemma, I have no idea what the answer is to that one.
As a global policy maker I say no, as a quick fix for the shortage, I say yes…

As for the tight regulations on foreign training for reciprocal recognition here… absolutely critical. Australian medicine is one of the highest standard in the world. It should stay that way.

Lastly, Bayviews take on private hospitals…. Correct! But private hospital cost cutting isn’t a patch on the public system cost cutting. we cant even get paid properly in Qld health.

cheers
 
So, how to fix the rural doctor shortage?

More Indians and Chinese?

Lower medical college pass rates for rural kids if they go back to rural areas? Rural kids get lower marks at school, simple as that. Possibly we are dumber out in the sticks? Probably less competition.

Place a medical college in a rural town. Plenty of rural college towns about like Armidale, Bathurst, Wagga, etc and that's just in NSW. City Docs would be likely to think better of rural areas if they spent their college years there.

Read today in a paper something about paying City docs to move bush? I don't really like that idea as it shouts 'subsidies to the bush', but if it works, then maybe? The city needs people living in the bush to supply the nations exports, so if there are no docs out there, then less people to produce the exports.



To change the subject a bit. What are peoples views on the punishment handed to Jayant Patel? Sounds a bit harsh to me? Life in gaol? Surely nothing was done on purpose but all an accident? Drunk drivers who kill other drivers get less.

I was expecting some bad press form India over the matter after the Indian students getting beat up and all, but apparently over there they couldn't care less.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...-little-sympathy/story-e6frg6nf-1225886429547


See ya's.
 
i think a better title would be

"is there a doctor in the electorate?".

who cares where they come from. i'm sure India's doctors are just as good as those here, they do have universities and medical schools, so why do we not allow them to practise here as well?

when you're sick, you don't care if they're wearing a burqua or they're skin colour is pink with purple polka dots or they speak pidgeon english, you just want to get well.

raising the bar of quality care is in the nation's best interests. why can we not train these doctors retrospectively (ie allow them to practise and homestudy)??? but i question the definition of "progress" - whereby "progress" means removing a doctor where there was one previously.

i don't know the entire story of patel, but the fact he was practising without a license doesn't necessarily make him unqualified, it just means he wasn't licensed.
 
Lower medical college pass rates for rural kids if they go back to rural areas? Rural kids get lower marks at school, simple as that. Possibly we are dumber out in the sticks? Probably less competition.

Place a medical college in a rural town. Plenty of rural college towns about like Armidale, Bathurst, Wagga, etc and that's just in NSW. City Docs would be likely to think better of rural areas if they spent their college years there.

i don't think the country is any dumber than the city. how is that possible? better quality of life in the sticks shoudl equate to higher scores.

probably because country folk see formal education as something that has to be done because the law requires it, not as a training ground for a career in sales assist.

helping dad on the farm is just as viable an option as heading into the city, whereas not many city kids have dreams about studying at AgSchool.
 
re doctors, GPs in particular, it would be better if they can communicate with patients regardless of their 1st language or country of origin.

even some born in this country, and have english as 1st language, do not demonstrate an ability to speak and listen to patients well. writing is another issue again.

some GPs these days seem to be just referral and script writers.

the days of the family doctor who provided continuity of care and knew the patients as people, and often the family history are long gone sadly.

re dr death, well he was prosecuted many are not.

will there now be action against those who employed him?
 
To change the subject a bit. What are peoples views on the punishment handed to Jayant Patel? Sounds a bit harsh to me? Life in gaol? Surely nothing was done on purpose but all an accident? Drunk drivers who kill other drivers get less.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...-little-sympathy/story-e6frg6nf-1225886429547

I read he got 7yrs, not life? (although in this country 7yrs isn't much less than a "life" sentence...) and personally I think he should have got a lot more...
He has damaged hundreds of patients he operated on and his level of surgical skill was less than a butcher. You don't accidentally kill or damage, to the level that he did, patient after patient after patient. Any doctor with a conscience, who was making the screw-ups he did would have put down his tools long before he was forced to.

As someone who has worked alongside doctors, I can firmly say (from personal experience) that the level of medical training received in Indian/Pakistani hospitals and universities, is far inferior to that received here.....to the point of it being scary. I have had to follow-up more medical mistakes than I could count from foreign trained Doctors. Nothing to do with race/ethnicity...just lack of training...

Drunk-drivers should also get a lot harsher penalties than they do...but thats a whole 'nother thread..

Nards
 
Re the rural Doc shortage
I’d make all training specialist colleges have a mandatory 6mn- 12mnths regional hospital time, in their first 2 years,
That way they have to train a bit out there and maybe make social contacts, see how the big system works instead of becoming isolated in the city ivory towers hospitals. Have a chance to appreciate and become part of the rural life.

pay for “doctor assistant electives” while they study or holidays, that way they get used to suturing, emergency care, all the stuff that is challenging to the new drs but the old ones are sick to death of but have to do because it isn’t nurse stuff.
They get a mentor in the rural Dr, he gets a hand, medical students come for the cash, get interested in the lifestyle.

wait for the flood of medical graduates to hit the hospitals in 2012. AMA release the projected figures are 2 920 graduates and 500 international graduates….who will be competing for 2030 intern places.
For the first time in our history we may have unemployed junior docs, just like in Europe. Where are they going to go? These are not the ones you want in the country, unsupervised practice takes ~5 years. Medicine is an apprenticeship as well as a profession.

TC they already pay heaps for rural doc packages to lure them to the bush, doesn’t work, the isolation is a killer. What is happening is more telemedicine and outreach. Some of the big city hospitals and the retrieval centres have interactive TV screens, and cameras, you can zoom in to the patients body, check the moniters, get the ECGs held up to the camera and treat someone quite sick 1000kms away and give advice on stabilisation or therapy while you make plans to retrieve them to a bigger centre or provide support and advice to the rural staff as the patient improves.

Re Jayant Patel, what a mess, I hope it will be overturned on appeal as 3 previous years of local press saturation about “Dr Death” and then being tried by a QLD jury is a complete bias and a wasted exercise.

Its hard to be a rogue surgeon by yourself (unless you try a la Harold shipman) someone has to put the patient to sleep and someone has to accept the patient into intensive care afterwards. Someone has to hand you your instruments and someone has to prepare for your next case… and the next..

He was probably difficult/impossible to work with and may have had poor patient selection. May have even been a crap surgeon. Whos going to judge that? A lay person? The journalist looking for the next sensationalist plug?

Get him judged by a panel of peers. He isn’t a danger to society if you take his licence away… ban him from medical registration in any Australian state and you have taken away his livelihood, his risk to society, his reputation and irreparably tainted his ego.
Problem goes away.

I have to comment on the level of medical standards of indian/Pakistani hospitals and doctors, Nards. I really disagree with you

I think overgeneralisation is a dangerous thing, those particular countries have highly variable standards for their unis and hospitals… the trick is….knowing which ones are the good ones! I have trained with some absolutely superlative Drs of those countries and some are world class with a level that is inspiring to see…. And some are hopeless... you cant judge training by race or country only…
plenty of dud docs everywhere. plenty of good ones too.
Cheers
 
The problem with doctors not wanting to go to the country is both a financial issue and a lifestyle issue, and sadly, the third one is the ego issue.

The financial issue is due to the pay. A well-placed young doc in a swank hossy or practice in the city will earn more generally. It is also a lot closer to home, friends, hangouts etc - easier life.

The lifestyle is as above; dealing with supposedly less cultured hicks, poorer work conditions and antiquated facilities (perceived), away form friends family and hangouts, and other exciting trappings of city life - for the young doctor.

And finally, for the aspiring answer to the world's health care issues with the $mill per year income; the country doesn't look good on the resume. Ya gotta be at the Alfred or similar. No-one wants to go out into the sticks and stifle their chances at the big time.
 
Its hard to be a rogue surgeon by yourself (unless you try a la Harold shipman) someone has to put the patient to sleep and someone has to accept the patient into intensive care afterwards. Someone has to hand you your instruments and someone has to prepare for your next case… and the next..

Agree with this 100%! Although, I have heard reported (no doubt unreliable I know) that nursing staff/ancilliary staff were afraid to speak up - as is regularly the case in the medical sector, when doctors and specialists make a "teamwork" environment near impossible. I think this is improving though.


He was probably difficult/impossible to work with and may have had poor patient selection. May have even been a crap surgeon. Whos going to judge that? A lay person? The journalist looking for the next sensationalist plug?

Get him judged by a panel of peers. He isn’t a danger to society if you take his licence away… ban him from medical registration in any Australian state and you have taken away his livelihood, his risk to society, his reputation and irreparably tainted his ego.
Problem goes away.

But is this price enough to pay for the lives lost and the ongoing pain caused to patients treated so badly by him??I think not. He also lost his license in the US and managed to come to Australia to work (how this occurred is a whole different thread)..if he was only to lose his registration here whats to stop him from moving to another unsuspecting health service overseas and continuing his poor practice.

I have to comment on the level of medical standards of indian/Pakistani hospitals and doctors, Nards. I really disagree with you

I think overgeneralisation is a dangerous thing, those particular countries have highly variable standards for their unis and hospitals… the trick is….knowing which ones are the good ones! I have trained with some absolutely superlative Drs of those countries and some are world class with a level that is inspiring to see…. And some are hopeless... you cant judge training by race or country only…
plenty of dud docs everywhere. plenty of good ones too.

I am sure there are plenty of world-class Drs from the sub-continent, however, sadly, I have have mostly poor experiences. The same can be said for African-trained Doctors. It has absolutely nothing to do with race or ethnicity (as previously mentioned) but what appears to be lack of/ sub-standard training in those areas. This is only my experience dealing with Doctors newly arrived to the hospital setting in this country, but who are practicing on real, live sick people who need protecting. I'm sure they are mostly capable of being brilliant doctors...but need more training in Australian or 1st world hospital. IMHO.
Cheers


...........
 
He has damaged hundreds of patients he operated on and his level of surgical skill was less than a butcher. You don't accidentally kill or damage, to the level that he did, patient after patient after patient. Any doctor with a conscience, who was making the screw-ups he did would have put down his tools long before he was forced to.
Nards

A bit of research I've done says a lot of the people who died were on their last legs anyway? Not much to lose by doing risky surgery? Removing bowels and stuff? It's not something you do to a healthy person? And surely it was passed by the hospital and medico's involved?

Maybe he was way over confident? Maybe he was a complete imbecile? Maybe he was useless, dumb, stupid, a lier, whatever. But I'm sure he was well intentioned, all doctors are, therefore it's a harsh penalty, no matter how many deaths were involved.


See ya's.
 
you are right TC. A lot of the patients were on thier last legs, risky surgery at the best of times in a tertiary major hospital let alone a little squirt hospital like Bundaberg.

its the old legal dilemma, if a man falls off a 20 story building and on the way down you shot him and killed him.. then seconds later he hits the ground,
did you commit murder? the jumper was going to die anyway.

as an aside nards, he didn't lose his licence in the US. He had restricted rights to practice independently with some (not all) major operations. He didn't tick the box that asked him wheter he had any previous practice issues when he applied for an australian job, QLD medical board did no background checks and that is their fault for not investigating thoroughly.
He got found out by a google search from one of the disgruntled hospital employees for crying out loud!!

I often wonder why he wasn't charged with fraud.

Nards i understand how contact with some overseas docs and bad experience personally makes you feel like sweeping generalisations are reasonable on a public forum.

I don't think they are.

best wishes for your day
cheers
 
Bottom line is that Jayant Patel was approved to work as a surgeon in Queensland UNDER SUPERVISION.

He went to Bundaberg and the "powers that be" appointed him Head of Surgery. From earlier reports it appears that he was encouraged to perform complex surgery as it brought financial rewards and extra funding to the hospital.

Administrative heads should roll...oh, sorry, forgot that QH administrators AND the Health Minister are protected species......
Marg
 
I think you would need a different training approach to get drs for the bush. Alot of the focus of medical training now seems to be on studying hard, cramming for exams, getting high marks etc, and alot of those type of high pressure people would never survive in General practice, let alone a rural practice. I think Newcastle Uni has a combination of marks and interviews to be able to get into the course, and they have a focus on rural practice. I think that has more potential to be successful than sending in overseas trained doctors, who really need a greater amount of supervision than what you can get in a rural practice.
and in some areas, there is probably a need for a more "community healthcare" model, where you have nurses and allied health professionals having a greater role, as well as use of telemedicine. Because for small towns, they are never going to have enough doctors to fill the gap, but at least if they had a frontline medical team for the more standard illnesses/ needs, maybe using telemedicine, then the Dr's could come in for the serious cases. I think its always going to be a challenge to fill the needs of a widespread, small population, so we will need to look for innovative solutions.

and in terms of Patel...........accountants and financial people are sent to jail for corrupt and dishonest practices.. how much more should there be punishment for a doctor who deliberately endangers peoples lives through inappropriate and unsafe surgery? The people who were affected were not all old and dying. I have a customer who is now in a wheelchair as a result of his botched surgeries. But the hospital and administrators should also be taking responsibility for allowing it to continue. Its a very sad situation......
 
The problem is, the individual docs do whats best for them…. But the home country suffers brain drain, should the wishes of the individual supersede the rights of the nation that trained them? It’s the prisoners dilemma, I have no idea what the answer is to that one.
As a global policy maker I say no, as a quick fix for the shortage, I say yes…

There's no dilemma at all.

Third world countries should not accept med students unless they sign up to do x decades of service in their home country. If they break that contract, they are penalized financially. Australia does similar for dentist graduates. They are encouraged to sign up for rural placement at the beginning of their course, when they are nice and green and naive. If they break the rural service contract, it can cost them 10s of thousands.

There is no dilemma if Australia wakes up and realizes it needs more Australian trained doctors in rural areas. The solution isn't to deprive more medically needy third world countries of their doctors, but to sort out the stupid union type power of the medical profession.

Medicine doesn't require the brightest and best academic students. I am a strong advocate for giving RNs a career path, by allowing them to do ongoing study towards general medical practice. A lot of nurses are very bright and build up a lot of invaluable experience, only to burn out in their late 30s. This expertise should not be wasted. The same is true in my field, physiotherapy. In fact, entry requirements into physio are tougher than medicine because the high number of enrollments received drives up the cut off point.
 
There is no dilemma if Australia wakes up and realizes it needs more Australian trained doctors in rural areas. The solution isn't to deprive more medically needy third world countries of their doctors, but to sort out the stupid union type power of the medical profession

that's a very macro, broader policy review.

and it's a great one at that - things at the top do need to change.

but it still doesn't solve the issue of a town that once had a doctor, now doesn't.
 
My take on the Patel thing after reading the summary of the findings from the QLD Supreme Court. I must say at the start that I feel for all the families involved and offer my condolences for their loss.

Criminal charges against a doctor who is (presumably) performing to the best of his ability is a new frontier. For one case (death after a sigmoid colectomy):

[66] This was three weeks after the sigmoid colectomy.
[67] The sigmoid colectomy was performed competently.
[68] The prosecution case, however, was that the procedure was unnecessary.
[69] The jury has concluded that your decision to operate on Mr Morris both caused his death and involved criminal negligence: that is, such a great falling short of the standard to have been expected of a surgeon, and showing such serious disregard for the patient’s welfare, that you should be punished as a criminal: in other words, that your decision to operate was so thoroughly reprehensible, involving such grave moral guilt, that it should be treated as a crime deserving of punishment.
[70] The other three surgical procedures were also performed competently enough.
[71] It is not how you carried out the procedures that matters.


This is what he was sentenced for, Nards, your comment of "his level of surgical skill was less than a butcher" doesn't really have anything to do with this case. You are not a surgeon and you weren't in the room so you are in no position to comment on his ability or otherwise. I think you've watched too many TV reports.

On the second manslaughter charge:

[77] He was an end-stage renal patient who needed haemodialysis to survive.
[85] Those were distinct indications that, in any future surgery, Mr Phillips would be at
significant risk.
[88] Dr Carter, an anaesthetist who was Head of the Intensive Care Unit at Bundaberg, knew Mr Phillips and about his medical complications.
[89] Dr Carter assessed Mr Phillips as a high risk patient.
[90] Even so, he thought him suitable for an oesophagectomy.
[91] Dr Carter was also content that his ICU could cope with Mr Phillips’s situation. [93] Two other doctors, including a specialist anaesthetist, assessed Mr Phillips’s suitability for an oesophagectomy. Both were satisfied that the operation could proceed.
[94] The oesophagectomy took place on 19 May. Mostly, it proceeded unremarkably.
[95] Mr Phillips, however, died two days later from an acute cardiac event.


Here, a very frail man with significant health problems dies from a heart attack after a major operation. An oesphagectomy involves deflating one lung and opening the chest and abdomen at the same time. They have a high mortality rate especially in ill patients. (The overall 3-year survival rate was 29.6% in one study) so:

[96] His heart failure was caused by potassium overload.
[97] The dialysis regime post-operatively had not removed enough potassium.
[98] You were not responsible for the dialysis. That was the responsibility of the Renal Unit, which was not under your direction.
[99] Nonetheless, the jury’s verdict establishes both that the oesophagectomy caused the patient’s death and that your decision to perform it was criminally negligent.


doesn't seem quite fair does it.


In the third manslaughter case:

[114] Although two prosecution cases were advanced concerning the death of Mr Kemps,
I take it to be established by the verdict that, by proceeding to perform the
oesophagectomy, you were criminally negligent.
[115] Mr Kemps died from blood loss you were unable to arrest.
[116] The bleeding had started during the oesophagectomy. It was surgical bleeding.


Death is a potential complication of any procedure. If you want a cosmetic procedure that you don't really need and die from anaphylaxis during anaesthesia, is the surgeon who decided to do your operation criminally negligent? No, because the risks, benefits and alternatives were discussed, I presume Dr Patel discussed them too. Who knows?


With reference to the GBH case:

[143] On the grievous bodily harm offence, you are sentenced to imprisonment for three years.

This was for resecting a colon for a benign tumour. This could mean that for wrong site surgery a surgeon may go to gaol... These errors occur and are impossible to eliminate in a system reliant on people not machines. Mistakes happen in all systems.

Overall, if you went through a busy surgeons cases over a few years you would find a similar number of deaths for similar reasons, in most cases the families would be understanding because they trust the doctor and knew that he/she did their best and what they thought was right, make the same doctor Indian and label him a butcher on TV and the families are no longer so understanding/forgiving. What I find surprising is that after all the millions spent on looking at him and his practice, this is all they changed him with. Surely if he was such a butcher there would be a trail of blood...


The judicial process is also a bit of a concern. Especially this comment:

The Order did not require you to obtain a second opinion from an Oregon surgeon before performing those operations in Queensland

I'm glad that this was pointed out, Could be hard for all the sick patients to undertake such a long trip for a doctor's visit...

The other issue is the idea of second opinion doesn't work well, Trying to get two doctors to agree on something this complicated is impossible. It is likely that there was no other surgeon in Bundaberg capable of performing these operations so who could they seek a second opinion from.

As a hospital administrator you can't just employ someone in an unsupervised position in the country, appoint him director, ask him to do his best, tell him "you'll be right", and then run away and stand with everyone else and point at him when it all turns to crap!

Anyway, vary hard to comment on this whole thing since none of us were there, but just some food for thought.

Cheers
Pulse
 
The lifestyle is as above; dealing with supposedly less cultured hicks, poorer work conditions and antiquated facilities (perceived), away form friends family and hangouts, and other exciting trappings of city life - for the young doctor.

I think this is very important. Even in metropolitan areas there appears to be a bias in service provision towards the better off suburbs (with the private schools, golf courses, trendy cafes etc).

Some regional areas have good value acreages, wineries and beaches that would attract some who want a middle-class doctors lifestyle (although the drier inland areas with the most acute shortages only have the cheap land).

In sparse rural areas school teachers and the odd accountant or town clerk are pretty much the top of the intellectual tree and there's few that the doctor would perceive as being their equal.

Part of the problem can be associated with loss of services, closures and changing labour markets.

Before local government amalgamations there were more town clerks and councillors. Before the banks shut there were more bank managers. Plus the local stationmaster, who handled both passengers and freight before the railway closed. There were also more farmers (often employing labourers who lived in second houses on the property) as property sizes were smaller on average. The local newspaper and radio station had more local content. These and similar occupations formed the basis of a (now vanished) bougeoise middle class that used to exist in country towns and with which the doctor would form friendships.

If the kids are academically inclined they now go off to the city for uni. If they're not they go work at the general store, hairdresser or auto wrecker. Not appetising for a doctor considering their family's future.

Sending your kids to so-called 'good schools' seem to be regarded as a major success of parenting. Much more now than in the past with the swing towards private schools.

NSW has had state selective entry schools, but they're rare in Victoria. However the opening of two (at Werribee and Berwick) could be an interesting experiment in challenging one of the key assumed advantages of inner over outer suburbs.

If it works in outer suburbs establishing such schools in rural areas would overcome one of the major reasons for people not raising kids in the country - lack of educational opportunity.

As for the other trappings of doctors lives I don't know, unless someone can find a way to transplant St Kilda's coffee strip to Stawell!
 
Are we “stealing” third world doctors? Yes! They are ALREADY trained they aren’t looking for more education, they are looking for a better life. And why shouldn’t they? It’s the right of humanity to want more for their kids and themselves.

The problem is, the individual docs do whats best for them…. But the home country suffers brain drain, should the wishes of the individual supersede the rights of the nation that trained them? It’s the prisoners dilemma, I have no idea what the answer is to that one.
As a global policy maker I say no, as a quick fix for the shortage, I say yes…
Yes, I read that there are more Sierra Leone-trained doctors in Chicago than in Sierra Leone. :eek: I don't know what the answer is, either. Perhaps to require each country to train as many doctors as it uses, even if they move around a bit? eg If Australia imports, on average, 1000 doctors trained overseas each year, then we should have to - under international law - take in 1000 overseas doctors for training each year. We're probably still stealing some of the brightest minds, but at least we wouldn't be adding "insult to injury" by requiring third world countries to pay for their education. :eek:
So, how to fix the rural doctor shortage? ... Place a medical college in a rural town. Plenty of rural college towns about like Armidale, Bathurst, Wagga, etc and that's just in NSW. City Docs would be likely to think better of rural areas if they spent their college years there.
I think that's a pretty good idea you've hit upon, TC. My Dad is a country pharmacist, and they find if they can get pharmacists to give the country a try when they're young, they're reasonably likely to marry a local and establish roots in the community, and stay long-term. But pharmacists who are established in the city are *extremely* difficult to "woo" to the country, at any price.
the country doesn't look good on the resume.
Really? Given that country docs get a much broader range of experiences, I would have thought it was valued.
 
Back
Top