Hi all
I have two existing properties, which I am about to refinance to draw on equity and make a third purchase.
IP #1 (Apartment)
Purchase date: 4/10/07
Purchase price: $278,000
Current valuation: $299,000
Initial loan amount: $224,000
Current loan amount: $210,700 (LVR: 70%)
Rental income: $410 pw
Cashflow: -$1,800 (2010-2011 FY, largely due to installation of tiles throughout the entire building costing some $2.5k)
IP #2 (House on 632 sqm land)
Purchase date: 15/12/08
Purchase price: $270,000
Current valuation: $292,000
Initial loan amount: $216,000
Current loan amount: $171,100 (LVR: 59%)
Rental income: $310 pw
Cashflow: -$440 (2010-2011 FY)
Cash in hand - $30,000
Current rental paid - $220 pw
Now I am looking at buying a third property (IP #3 & PPOR) @ $410K, with the following scenarios:
Scenario A - Lease the whole property out (move back in with parents)
Rental income: $340pw
Net cashflow: -$150pw
Scenario B - Lease two bedrooms, live in the third)
Rental income: $270pw
Net cashflow: -$140pw (My own "rental cost")
Scenario C - Lease out three bedrooms, live in the fourth
Rental income: $405pw
Net cashflow: -$80pw (My own "rental cost")
Scenario D - Live in it by myself
Out-of-pocket expense: $600 pw
The land is large enough to subdivide. I have seen numerous properties in the region that have already subdivided and built on. It has easy access to public transport to the city, and I am of the belief that the area is due for a rise in value.
I would like to purchase this property with the intent of living in it for 5-10 years, then possibly subdividing and developing.
So from this, I have drawn the conclusion that it is cheaper in the long run than renting if I purchase a property, live in it, and rent out the other rooms (Scenario A can be treated as a contingency plan in the bizarre event that no individual tenants are happy to sign on). It is most likely I will go for scenario B.
The thing that is given me greatest pause however is that it is significantly cash flow negative in the tune of $140 pw. My previous two properties will cost far far less to hold that this one. Psychologically this is my barrier.
I would like to invite comment on my current portfolio and the suitability of IP #3/PPOR.
1/. Am I doing the right thing in having a significantly negative cashflow property given the possibility of falls in property value?
2/. Is my justification of reduced "rent" a valid one? Or is my logic flawed? I am 29 years old and might consider a family in the next 2-3 years. This potentially has a huge impact on the investment cashflow.
3/. Do people think that controlling a block of land with development potential is worth the significant out of pocket expenses?
I would greatly appreciate any comments and thoughts. Be as rough as you like.
I have two existing properties, which I am about to refinance to draw on equity and make a third purchase.
IP #1 (Apartment)
Purchase date: 4/10/07
Purchase price: $278,000
Current valuation: $299,000
Initial loan amount: $224,000
Current loan amount: $210,700 (LVR: 70%)
Rental income: $410 pw
Cashflow: -$1,800 (2010-2011 FY, largely due to installation of tiles throughout the entire building costing some $2.5k)
IP #2 (House on 632 sqm land)
Purchase date: 15/12/08
Purchase price: $270,000
Current valuation: $292,000
Initial loan amount: $216,000
Current loan amount: $171,100 (LVR: 59%)
Rental income: $310 pw
Cashflow: -$440 (2010-2011 FY)
Cash in hand - $30,000
Current rental paid - $220 pw
Now I am looking at buying a third property (IP #3 & PPOR) @ $410K, with the following scenarios:
Scenario A - Lease the whole property out (move back in with parents)
Rental income: $340pw
Net cashflow: -$150pw
Scenario B - Lease two bedrooms, live in the third)
Rental income: $270pw
Net cashflow: -$140pw (My own "rental cost")
Scenario C - Lease out three bedrooms, live in the fourth
Rental income: $405pw
Net cashflow: -$80pw (My own "rental cost")
Scenario D - Live in it by myself
Out-of-pocket expense: $600 pw
The land is large enough to subdivide. I have seen numerous properties in the region that have already subdivided and built on. It has easy access to public transport to the city, and I am of the belief that the area is due for a rise in value.
I would like to purchase this property with the intent of living in it for 5-10 years, then possibly subdividing and developing.
So from this, I have drawn the conclusion that it is cheaper in the long run than renting if I purchase a property, live in it, and rent out the other rooms (Scenario A can be treated as a contingency plan in the bizarre event that no individual tenants are happy to sign on). It is most likely I will go for scenario B.
The thing that is given me greatest pause however is that it is significantly cash flow negative in the tune of $140 pw. My previous two properties will cost far far less to hold that this one. Psychologically this is my barrier.
I would like to invite comment on my current portfolio and the suitability of IP #3/PPOR.
1/. Am I doing the right thing in having a significantly negative cashflow property given the possibility of falls in property value?
2/. Is my justification of reduced "rent" a valid one? Or is my logic flawed? I am 29 years old and might consider a family in the next 2-3 years. This potentially has a huge impact on the investment cashflow.
3/. Do people think that controlling a block of land with development potential is worth the significant out of pocket expenses?
I would greatly appreciate any comments and thoughts. Be as rough as you like.