Hi all,
I hope you can lend your advice on this matter and answer a few other somewhat related questions.
I've recently had my PM contact me regarding the vents on the central aircon not blowing air into the bedroom and kitchen area. She has advised me that it will cost $100 to get one of the techies whom originally installed the aircon when the building was originally built to have a look at it. she also advised that all related costs in repaired shall be covered by myself. I questioned this as I thought the BC should pay for this as I thought it fell into the same realm as the lifts etc. She then sent me the attached minutes which show a ruling that the aircons will NOT be covered by the BC, instead the owners would now be liable.
My questions are:
1) Is this change listed in the minutes legal?
2) Is it within my rights to find a tradesman to have a look and quote for free? or would it be best to use the original techies.
3) If the fault is found to be found outside of my walls, would the BC have to cover this?
4) Is there anything else at all I can do or should I just bite the bullet?
I simply don't understand why i'm paying seemingly ridiculous BC fees when i only own a small studio. What the hell is the point if the central air is not covered??
The breakdown of the B/C fees are
$1300 administrative fund
$950 sinking fund
$50 Insurance Levy
thats $9200p.a! which is just shy of 50% of my gross rental.
For my future reference - would landlord insurance have covered this if I had it?
Also another unrelated question - I've been asked by my PM (on behalf of the tennants) to build a balconny cover as my unit has one of those large alfresco style balconys which tend to collect rubbish from the wonderful tenants above. I orginally agreed to this as I thought all it would involve is essentially polycarbonate roofing on a couple of sticks (yes i know I am oversimplfying, but you get the picture). However when the PM came back with a quote, the cover was going to cost just shy of 10k. Isn't this a little excessive? Is there a cheaper way? surely some polycarbonate would be sufficient?
Thanks for taking the time to read.
S
I hope you can lend your advice on this matter and answer a few other somewhat related questions.
I've recently had my PM contact me regarding the vents on the central aircon not blowing air into the bedroom and kitchen area. She has advised me that it will cost $100 to get one of the techies whom originally installed the aircon when the building was originally built to have a look at it. she also advised that all related costs in repaired shall be covered by myself. I questioned this as I thought the BC should pay for this as I thought it fell into the same realm as the lifts etc. She then sent me the attached minutes which show a ruling that the aircons will NOT be covered by the BC, instead the owners would now be liable.
My questions are:
1) Is this change listed in the minutes legal?
2) Is it within my rights to find a tradesman to have a look and quote for free? or would it be best to use the original techies.
3) If the fault is found to be found outside of my walls, would the BC have to cover this?
4) Is there anything else at all I can do or should I just bite the bullet?
I simply don't understand why i'm paying seemingly ridiculous BC fees when i only own a small studio. What the hell is the point if the central air is not covered??
The breakdown of the B/C fees are
$1300 administrative fund
$950 sinking fund
$50 Insurance Levy
thats $9200p.a! which is just shy of 50% of my gross rental.
For my future reference - would landlord insurance have covered this if I had it?
Also another unrelated question - I've been asked by my PM (on behalf of the tennants) to build a balconny cover as my unit has one of those large alfresco style balconys which tend to collect rubbish from the wonderful tenants above. I orginally agreed to this as I thought all it would involve is essentially polycarbonate roofing on a couple of sticks (yes i know I am oversimplfying, but you get the picture). However when the PM came back with a quote, the cover was going to cost just shy of 10k. Isn't this a little excessive? Is there a cheaper way? surely some polycarbonate would be sufficient?
Thanks for taking the time to read.
S
Last edited by a moderator: