Major lenders vs non-major lenders when having savings

Discussion in 'Property Finance' started by Micasa, 11th Jun, 2009.

  1. Micasa

    Micasa Member

    Joined:
    11th Jun, 2009
    Messages:
    8
    Location:
    Sydney
    Hi,

    I’ve been saving for a while and now I’d like to start investing in properties. My plan is to ask for a 90% LVR loan for my first property because in this way I should still have some cash remaining for another 90% loan in the near future and be able to get a second property.

    So, being myself and my partner both full docs and having enough genuine savingsis there any point on dealing with non-major lenders?

    I want an offset account, so RAMS is out of the equation, but how about for instance FirstMac?

    My understanding after reading through several threads in this forum is that non-major lenders might be your option if you want a 95% LVR loan or you are a low doc (or both!).

    Is there any other advantage that could be relevant in my case? Is it for instance easier to get your equity out once the value of your property has grown?

    Regarding cross-coll, for what I’ve read here, with the big banks it is possible to avoid having properties cross-collaterised if you define the right structures. Is there any difference in this regard between major lenders and non-major lenders?

    Cheers!
     
  2. Qlds007

    Qlds007 Broker,full time investor

    Joined:
    3rd Mar, 2005
    Messages:
    2,512
    Location:
    Ozwide
    Hi Micasa

    Rather than a 90% lend why not consider a 95% lvr.

    Yes a rare beast these days I admit but still doable. Interest only with 100% offset would suit you even better. Dont think you will find too many non banking lenders offer such a product.

    Firstmac does not offer a true offset account so whilst the fixed rate is attractive for year 1 dont think it will operate in the same way as a traditional offset account.

    No reason if structured correctly why the loan needs to be cross collateralised.
     
  3. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Member

    Joined:
    2nd Mar, 2001
    Messages:
    18,791
    Location:
    Confused = Sydney, Brisbane and Gold Coast
    What Richard said !

    my offering is 95 % lo doc :)

    I cant remember that being around for too long

    ta
    rolf
     
  4. Qlds007

    Qlds007 Broker,full time investor

    Joined:
    3rd Mar, 2005
    Messages:
    2,512
    Location:
    Ozwide
    Rolf

    So you dont wanna buy some cheap Mobius shares ?
     
  5. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Member

    Joined:
    2nd Mar, 2001
    Messages:
    18,791
    Location:
    Confused = Sydney, Brisbane and Gold Coast
    I heard the delinquincy numbers are "interesting" as are the Seizure :) no doc 90s...............



    ta
    rolf
     
  6. Micasa

    Micasa Member

    Joined:
    11th Jun, 2009
    Messages:
    8
    Location:
    Sydney
    Thanks Richard/Rolf.

    Looks like there is no big difference (apart from the numbers) between the big and the small fish, then.

    Regarding going 95%... I think it is not worth paying that extra LMI right now and looks like since no many lenders offer it, the final product might be more expensive.

    Maybe for the second property I consider it, but for a newbie sounds a bit of a big step at the moment.

    :)
     
  7. Aaron Sice

    Aaron Sice Seldom Seen Kid

    Joined:
    7th Dec, 2007
    Messages:
    11,579
    Location:
    Ocean Reef, WA
    i'm a lo-doc 80 - no "seizures" here unless IRs head to 20% - both from the bank and my heart