The reason that cheap(ish) positive cashflow properties make me nervous is the potential maintenance issues.
e.g. replacing a switchboard costs roughly the same is a 150K and 500K place.
My basic assumption is that most of the cashflow positive places tend to be towards the cheap end of things and be older/dodgier properties. Being cheap the percentage of total value that a big essential maintenance job can costs is much higher than a more expensive property.
e.g. replacing a switchboard costs roughly the same is a 150K and 500K place.
My basic assumption is that most of the cashflow positive places tend to be towards the cheap end of things and be older/dodgier properties. Being cheap the percentage of total value that a big essential maintenance job can costs is much higher than a more expensive property.