Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
*snip*
I also don't like the idea of interest only loands which seem to be preferred by most people with a lot of cash positive properties, I prefer the idea of paying off p&o on my properties over time even if it meant I only have 5 instead of 10.
*snip*
cheers
YPG
Hi TPG,
I was 23 when I bought my first IP. This was really before I was edumacated, and the concept of IO loans was foreign to me. It wasn't until I read some Jan Somers and some Peter Spann, that I finally "got" the concept, probably 5 years late! Agree, IO may not be for everyone, BUT don't make the decision based on "what feels right" as you may not fully appreciate how the numbers work with P&I vs. IO. Do some more research, ask more questions, and then make your decisions based on FACTS.
Using your example:
Let's say using P&I you could purchase 1 property every 2 years. So after 10 years, you've got 5. The first 1 has had 10 years growth, the 2nd 8, the 3rd 6 and so on, the last one maybe 2.
And using IO, you can purchase 1 property every year, due to increased servicability. Even if you still only bought 5 properties, all in the first 5 years, after 10 years, the 1st will have had 10 years growth, the 2nd 9, the 3rd 7, but the last one has had 5 years.
It is likely that the second situation will result in a higher net value that the first. Maybe it would be possible to sell 1 and use that to pay off some other debt. OR you could purchase 1 every year for the 10 years.
Hope this doesn't come across as condescending; just want you to challenge your own thinking as to WHY one would choose P&I or IO loans.
And this might be a stupid question that portrays my age and inexperience: but if we are really in a housing price bubble won't having 10 IO properties be more risky than having 5 PI properties? Or is this not a good way of looking at it?
In a falling market, you're screwed even if you have no loans.
It's not necessarily a BAD idea, but there might be better ideas!*snip*
And that is why I felt paying off some of the principal was a good idea - however you have pointed out that this may not be the case and I may be basing personal feelings towards something I should investigate more.
I am only 20 years old myself and with the help of my parents I have just signed a contract of my first property that is P&I which was probably influenced by my parents as they have always preferred that method. But I agree with you that I should really investigate all options. I should probably have some meetings with some knowledgeable professionals and outline the best strategy and goals for me.
*snip*
Cheers,
YPG
Hey everyone,
Does it worry anyone else that the majority of properties that are cash flow positive are in a regional place?
I've always thought my strategy would be to buy with 15k of major cities?
But obviously a few cash flow positive properties can balance out the overall port folio.
However, I am a bit skeptical about regional places but I guess it all comes down to due diligence whether or not I believe the town will grow in the long run.
Who here is sold/not sold on cash flow positive properties in regional towns?