Questions mainly for Mortgage Brokers (I guess)...

Hello all.

My wife & I:

* Live in NSW
* Have zero debt
* Have no credit cards
* Have $170,000 in savings
* Qualify for the FHOG and no stamp duty
* Have three children (6 months, 8 & 12 yrs)
* I receive a Disability Support Pension and my wife a Carer Pension.

Here's the list of payments I receive each fortnight:

Disability Support Pension $453.30
Pension Basic Supplement (for GST) $16.20
Pharmaceutical Allowance $3.00

Utility Allowance $9.62
Telephone Allowance $1.69

And here's a list my wife's fortnightly payments:

Family Tax A $454.02
Family Tax B $71.26
Large Family Supplement $10.36
Carer Allowance $100.60
Carer (Basic) Payment $453.30
Pension Basic Supplement (for GST) $16.20
Pharmaceutical Allowance $3.00

Utilities Allowance $9.62
Telephone Allowance $1.69
Family Tax Benefit Part A Supplement $26.39
Family Tax Benefit Part B Supplement $12.92
Carer Allowance Recipients $38.46
Carer Allowance Recipients $23.08
Education Tax Refund $28.85
Ironing clothes $40.00

Mr subtotal: $483.81
Mrs subtotal: $1289.74
F/Nightly Total: $1773.55

BUT... I think lenders only count the payments in bold above. If so, then:

Mr subtotal: $472.50
Mrs subtotal: $1108.74
F/Nightly Total: $1581.24

I have entered the two totals above into online "how much can I borrow" calculators. But I know some lenders will not even lend to Centrelink recipients (or if they do, the amount is so low, you may as well not bother :(). I also know the amount they will loan falls dramatically once lenders learn Centrelink is the income source. (It shouldn't, because a Disability Pension is secure, and therefore shouldn't be judged like other Centrelink payments such as unemployment benefit.)

We have detailed records of every dollar in and out of our household since Dec 2006 (and bank records since 2002). They clearly show our savings ability (and therefore the amount we can service a loan with) is way above what lenders assume Centrelink recipients can repay. (For proof they need look no further than our deposit we saved from basically $0. Apart from about $65,000 received recently from an inheritance, we saved the other $110,000 ourselves over the last 5 years.)

We can prove through documentation we can effortlessly stick to a strict, long-term budget. We typically have about $1050 of spare cash per fortnight to service a loan. (That amount does not include bank interest, because I realise any interest earned will cease once we use our savings to purchase a property.) Also, if we buy a PPoR rather than an IP, we would no longer need to pay $145/week in rent.

That effectively means most fortnights we would have $1050 + $290 = $1340 to service a loan.

While there are some properties in our area (Newcastle, NSW) about $240,000 - anything decent typically begins about $280,000. So we would need a loan of between $56,000 to $96,000. The repayments on $96,000 (over 25 years) are about $143/week. This is the same as our current rent. So it's obvious we could not only manage, but pay a $96,000 loan off in record time. (I estimate about 3.5 years.)

What I would like to know is...

1. Based on our income, are there lenders that will lend these amounts to us, being Centrelink/Pension recipients?

2. In order to find such a lender, will we find ourselves having to accept:

a. Higher interest rates?
b. No offset account, or LOC available to us?
c. Early loan payout penalty fees?

3. We have always swung between buying in Newcastle, or, buying a rural property (ideally 100 acres or so with no current dwelling). Are there lenders that will lend to us for rural property as our first purchase? (Assuming similar loan amounts.)

4. Assuming we bought a PPoR, paid out our first loan in 3.5 years, then rented it out - it now being valued at $300,000 and earning $300 per week rent... What kind of loan amount could we expect to then borrow, to buy Rural acreage? (Using our PPoR as security if necessary - and no change to our income source.)

(Ideally I'd like to have IPs as our income source, rather than Centrelink pensions. But we'd like our kids to grow up in a rural area - and I'm mindfull that our oldest doesn't have many years now for us to do that.)

Thanks for reading this far! :D
 
FM

Each lender will assess differently aspects of your income so there is no hard and fast rule.

On saying this if they are to consider your income then any lender will also want to consider the normal expenses such as an assumed living allowance.

Regretfully irrespective of your savings history or what you believe you spend each month the lender will work in certain fixed criteria to their calculation.

In answer to your questions raised

What I would like to know is...

1. Based on our income, are there lenders that will lend these amounts to us, being Centrelink/Pension recipients? YES

2. In order to find such a lender, will we find ourselves having to accept:

a. Higher interest rates? No
b. No offset account, or LOC available to us? Both would be available
c. Early loan payout penalty fees? Non other than the normal discharge fees

3. We have always swung between buying in Newcastle, or, buying a rural property (ideally 100 acres or so with no current dwelling). Are there lenders that will lend to us for rural property as our first purchase? (Assuming similar loan amounts.) Yes but limited number that like large acreage

4. Assuming we bought a PPoR, paid out our first loan in 3.5 years, then rented it out - it now being valued at $300,000 and earning $300 per week rent... What kind of loan amount could we expect to then borrow, to buy Rural acreage? (Using our PPoR as security if necessary - and no change to our income source The rent would be added in as an income at between 75-80% of the actual rent received. Figures of course would vary on too many variable to give you a borrowing amount like that.
 
We typically have about $1050 of spare cash per fortnight to service a loan.
I'm not sure if I'm impressed at your ability to be thrifty :), or horrified that the taxpayer is contributing $525 per week to your savings account! :eek:

Knowing nothing of your circumstances, I'll assume that you are genuinely disabled and acknowledge that no money can compensate for your health; so I'll lean towards the former and say a hearty well done to your family on making the most of difficult circumstances. :) Kudos to you for thinking ahead, and good luck finding a lender for the property of your dreams. (And as Richard has said, you should be able to find a lender.)

I'm a bit torn as to whether to buy the Newcastle or rural property first... as you've highlighted, your 12yo doesn't have that many years left to enjoy the rural lifestyle. But the Newcastle property would probably appreciate more rapidly, giving you a kick-start to what I hope will become a substantial portfolio.

My vote, now I think about it, would be to see if you can swing both. :D $170K in savings is far more than I've ever had! What about using $60K as a 20% deposit on a $300K investment property in Newcastle to rent out, and $110K as a larger deposit on a rural property? There may well be lenders who'd allow you to take out both mortgages now.
 
I'm not sure if I'm impressed at your ability to be thrifty :), or horrified that the taxpayer is contributing $525 per week to your savings account!

I know exactly what you're saying. We detest relying on Centrelink handouts. It's one of the main reasons we are so strict with money. (To one day support ourselves through our own investments.) This is why I read investing forums, buy/borrow books and investment seminar materials like McKnight, Jakobi, Comben, etc. I read, watch, learn, then usually resell.

If you're horrified at what we save, spare a thought for others' (us included) disgust at what everyone else on Centrelink WASTE. Ok, we don't drink, smoke, gamble, eat takeaway, or go to movies. We drink only water, make our own muesli from oats, bread... (Well, that is, my lovely wife does all these.) And ok our rent is cheaper than most at $145 + we get slightly more than some due to the children. But still... There's no reason everyone couldn't do the same with some sacrifice. Albeit a little slower. Our savings have only been in an online only account earning interest. ie. nothing particularly advanced investing-wise to date.

Knowing nothing of your circumstances, I'll assume that you are genuinely disabled and acknowledge that no money can compensate for your health; so I'll lean towards the former and say a hearty well done to your family on making the most of difficult circumstances.

I know the system is in place for such people/situations and am so grateful for it. But even we roll our eyes when on TV people scream more taxes should go towards handing out more money. Not to say that the payments are meant as compensation, but no.... Nothing makes up for not being able to kick a ball with your son, or build the kids a treehouse.

Kudos to you for thinking ahead, and good luck finding a lender for the property of your dreams. (And as Richard has said, you should be able to find a lender.)

If only we can make up our mind what's best. :rolleyes:

My vote, now I think about it, would be to see if you can swing both. There may well be lenders who'd allow you to take out both mortgages now.

Thanks. We'll consider that. Our greatest hurdle will be Centrelink rules. It's as if the government prefers we splurge all spare cash on smokes, grog, and paytv. Our next biggest problem is the amount lenders will lend. Mid last year it was only 50 to $60,000.

Oh and before I forget thanks to Richard too. :)
 
I know exactly what you're saying. We detest relying on Centrelink handouts. It's one of the main reasons we are so strict with money. (To one day support ourselves through our own investments.)
Kudos to you, familyman, wish there were more like you. :)
familyman said:
If you're horrified at what we save, spare a thought for others' (us included) disgust at what everyone else on Centrelink WASTE.
Oh yes, we all hate that! I'm much more pleased to see your family making an effort to get ahead.
familyman said:
I know the system is in place for such people/situations and am so grateful for it.
Me, too. I'm glad to see families like yours making the most of difficult circumstances.
familyman said:
Our greatest hurdle will be Centrelink rules. It's as if the government prefers we splurge all spare cash on smokes, grog, and paytv.
Yes, well, that could be a whole new thread, I'm sure... :rolleyes: The rules are ridiculous, and overly complex.
familyman said:
Our next biggest problem is the amount lenders will lend.
Don't just go to "your" bank and ask them; you really need a good broker. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. The lenders' policies do vary enormously, and I'm sure you'd find one who'd lend you substantially more (as Richard has suggested).
 
Have $170,000 in savings

I receive a Disability Support Pension and my wife a Carer Pension.

Here's the list of payments I receive each fortnight:

Disability Support Pension $453.30
Pension Basic Supplement (for GST) $16.20
Pharmaceutical Allowance $3.00
Utility Allowance $9.62
Telephone Allowance $1.69

And here's a list my wife's fortnightly payments:

Family Tax A $454.02
Family Tax B $71.26
Large Family Supplement $10.36
Carer Allowance $100.60
Carer (Basic) Payment $453.30
Pension Basic Supplement (for GST) $16.20
Pharmaceutical Allowance $3.00
Utilities Allowance $9.62
Telephone Allowance $1.69
Family Tax Benefit Part A Supplement $26.39
Family Tax Benefit Part B Supplement $12.92
Carer Allowance Recipients $38.46
Carer Allowance Recipients $23.08
Education Tax Refund $28.85
Ironing clothes $40.00

Mr subtotal: $483.81
Mrs subtotal: $1289.74
F/Nightly Total: $1773.55

Wow - 46k p.a. coupled with

We detest relying on Centrelink handouts


I'm struggling to reconcile those two statements. Must be just me.
 
Must be just me.
What's your point? Are you suggesting that familyman likes being on disability benefits?

If so, I think that's mean-spirited in the extreme. If familyman can achieve this much on benefits, I'm sure with that kind of "get-up-and-go" he could do a lot more in the workforce or business, if it were possible for him to do so.

Perhaps you should try being chronically ill or disabled for a while, and see if it's such a bloody lark.
 
My point is as I stated, I am struggling to re-concile his two statements. :)

Are you serious?

You can hate pooping as much as you like, you're not going to stop.

He can hate taking benefits as much as he likes, doesn't mean he's fit to work.

Does that make it clear enough?
 
I'm glad it's not just me, murtagh - I couldn't see the contradiction, either.

Ah well... You get used to it. :( Maybe if things were reversed I'd feel the same, who knows.

Maybe people would be happier if we lived it up, spending that spare amount instead? But as mentioned previously I'm planning a self-funded future for us. (If I get it right.) Besides, we can't be blamed for someone in gov. determining amounts given out blanket fashion. Do I think the amount handed out is excessive? Yep. Am I crazy enough to hand back what we struggled to budget and save like scrooges, while others didn't bother? Nope.

Sure I do feel guilty every day, but I have lost my ability to provide financially for my family. So what I am given, I am determined to be grateful for and use responsibly as I can, so that MY children don't turn to accepting handouts when they're older.

(If we just squandered it, this would be a definite possibility. We live in a government housing area and see that very thing every day. Second and third generation Newstart recipients like our next door neighbours. Who sit at home all day smoking pot, swilling grog, watching porn on Foxtel, telling their pit bull to "Shuddup!" its barking, pulling unregistered cars and motorbikes apart in the backyard and riding them up and down the street with no helmet, screaming at their five kids calling them f'ing c's, then making them go door to door begging for milk, bread, and cigarettes instead of making them go to school.)

No way. Welfare ends here.

In fact once when we were overpaid by mistake, we tried to return it. We took the cash to a Centrelink branch and the counter guy called a supervisor over. We were dumbfounded as they told us it had happened to many others due to some software glitch, but was more hassle for them to take it back than it was worth. He then said, "It was Centrelink's mistake mate. You can't be blamed for it, so just spend it and get outta here, will ya!"

I said, "More than it's worth? When 'many others' received the same overpayment!?" He got irked with me and said if I didn't want it, I could give it to him and he'd find something to spend it on. :eek:
 
Last edited:
shoot me down in flames - I dont mind.

Im curious why you and your wife had a 3rd child. You state you dislike living of Centrelink. Isnt another baby just another mouth for Centrelink to support ?

Not really my business, but then again Im a taxpayer so maybe it is my business ?
 
Familyman,

What I couldn't reconcile was the income, the revenue side of the equation if you will, whereas most of your posting seems to be concentrating on the outflow, the cost and savings side of the equation. That side is your personal business and I have no right to comment on that side. Seems like you are doing a sterling job however. Well done.

As a taxpayer, I have every right to comment on the revenue side of your equation.

we can't be blamed for someone in gov. determining amounts given out blanket fashion.

Indeed you cannot, but it doesn't make it any less incredulous for me at least to find this out. I had no idea the Govt was paying that well....say, $ 525 a week too well. $ 886 per week is a good wicket, wouldn't you agree ?


Do I think the amount handed out is excessive? Yep.

OK, we're fully agreed then.


Am I crazy enough to hand back what we struggled to budget and save like scrooges, while others didn't bother? Nope.

....or another way of looking at it, perhaps the gross amount received is a little excessive to start with. Obviously you can live well on far less, and if forced to, to save the Govt billions in expenses, perhaps the other recipients you delight in deriding / comparing yourself with could also cope easily on less.

Sure I do feel guilty every day

OK - now I am fully reconciled. I knew it wasn't just me.


Welfare ends here.

OK.
 
shoot me down in flames - I dont mind.

Im curious why you and your wife had a 3rd child. You state you dislike living of Centrelink. Isnt another baby just another mouth for Centrelink to support ?

Not really my business, but then again Im a taxpayer so maybe it is my business ?

This is complete crap. FM is sticking by the laws of the land, whether you like it or not.

The guy has asked a perfectly legitimate question about his position and instead of meaningful answers is getting the usual pile-on of ******** from the haters.

I honestly can't believe that people with single-digit numbers of posts have decided to come out of the woodwork for this. You could be researching your local area, and posting your findings - or posting details of your wide investing experience and the lessons you've earnt. But no, you're right - attacking someone who is legally claiming entitled benefits is far more instructive for everyone.

Seriously, I paid well more than 46k in taxes last year and as a young/healthy male, I used probably a poofteenth of the services that tax money went to provide. So for the purposes of this post, lets pretend that I just directly paid FM and then we can all move on.

FM, for what it is worth I have to second the "talk to a broker" recommendation. You will find that a good broker (PM me if you can't find one) will be able to open doors that you don't even know exist.
 
I honestly can't believe that people with single-digit numbers of posts have decided to come out of the woodwork for this.


Sorry 'bout that. I had no idea that number of posts meant different posting privileges. Must be what those funny green dots are.

Why don't they tell you this stuff when you sign up ??
 
Sorry 'bout that. I had no idea that number of posts meant different posting privileges. Must be what those funny green dots are.

Why don't they tell you this stuff when you sign up ??

I have no idea what you're trying to say here? I feel like you're being sarcastic?

My point still stands: there's far more productive things that you could be doing for this community than attacking disabled people.

I'm not sure how making FM justify what the government gives him will enrich anyone's life. But have at it if you must ...
 
shoot me down in flames - I dont mind.

Im curious why you and your wife had a 3rd child. You state you dislike living of Centrelink. Isnt another baby just another mouth for Centrelink to support ?

Not really my business, but then again Im a taxpayer so maybe it is my business ?

The reason why we had #3 is we had two boys (pre-disability btw) and wanted a girl. As for Centrelink supporting #3, it's breastfeeding only for now. :p

The "extra" per child is no incentive to procreate. I can't recall the exact increase now, but I think it was about $15/week.
 
Back
Top