Right now on triple j radio there's a segment about the 'rental crisis'.
Most of the examples they gave were students with one example saying that $300 for a room in a share house. I dont know why students dont stay with parents and / or get part time jobs.
Talkback callers asked for the end of neg gearing to reduce investors buying and therefor make it more affordable to purchase. Another asked for an increase in rental assistance payments.
Radio announcer was an idiot saying darwin was winning because theyre at 7% vacancy.
Labor and liberal spokespeople were both on. Both argued with each other despite having the same message: ng not on radar; reduce incoming/outgoing transactional costs for both purchasing and renting; reduce redtape on developing.
Thoughts?
Most of the examples they gave were students with one example saying that $300 for a room in a share house. I dont know why students dont stay with parents and / or get part time jobs.
Talkback callers asked for the end of neg gearing to reduce investors buying and therefor make it more affordable to purchase. Another asked for an increase in rental assistance payments.
Radio announcer was an idiot saying darwin was winning because theyre at 7% vacancy.
Labor and liberal spokespeople were both on. Both argued with each other despite having the same message: ng not on radar; reduce incoming/outgoing transactional costs for both purchasing and renting; reduce redtape on developing.
Thoughts?