Hello fellow members.
I have just had my finance approved for my second IP. I have heard and read allot about people saying that you should get the structure of your assests set up correctly from day 1. And also that you should very rarely buy an investment in your own name.
I am a very keen young property investor and wish to aquire at least 10 properties, so getting the structure set up correctly from the start is a concern to me as pointed out by many people in books. It also saves you money down the track from converting the properties from my name into a trust setup, for asset protection.
I am 22, single, purchasing buy and hold neg geared property in my name only. I am not in a job that is exposed to litigation. But you can get sued for anything now'a days. Hence the reason for asset protection for the future.
Deciding whether to buy as a trust is a bit of unknown territory for me, and I think if I go talk to an accountant they would say that they would love to set up a trust for me, more money for them of course.
One thing I have read discussing the "Traps with purchasing" is that when a company or a trust borrows against the equity, the tax office treat this as a dispersed income from the trust or company and you have to pay tax on it. That doesnt sound very advantageous, but is this what you give up in return for asset protection?
Any advice or further information, even books I can read (other than "How to legally reduce your tax" By Ed Chan & Tony Melvin) would be greatly appreaciated. Also I dont take any information as specific legal advice.
Thanks in advance
I have just had my finance approved for my second IP. I have heard and read allot about people saying that you should get the structure of your assests set up correctly from day 1. And also that you should very rarely buy an investment in your own name.
I am a very keen young property investor and wish to aquire at least 10 properties, so getting the structure set up correctly from the start is a concern to me as pointed out by many people in books. It also saves you money down the track from converting the properties from my name into a trust setup, for asset protection.
I am 22, single, purchasing buy and hold neg geared property in my name only. I am not in a job that is exposed to litigation. But you can get sued for anything now'a days. Hence the reason for asset protection for the future.
Deciding whether to buy as a trust is a bit of unknown territory for me, and I think if I go talk to an accountant they would say that they would love to set up a trust for me, more money for them of course.
One thing I have read discussing the "Traps with purchasing" is that when a company or a trust borrows against the equity, the tax office treat this as a dispersed income from the trust or company and you have to pay tax on it. That doesnt sound very advantageous, but is this what you give up in return for asset protection?
Any advice or further information, even books I can read (other than "How to legally reduce your tax" By Ed Chan & Tony Melvin) would be greatly appreaciated. Also I dont take any information as specific legal advice.
Thanks in advance