Something not quite right with these numbers...

Let's play a little game. Here's are two 2/2/2 brick veneer units built some time in the 90s on the market somewhere in one of the major centres in Central Queensland asking $175000 each with some calculations for the cash flow and yield done by the selling agent. Each is currently tenanted at just under $240 a week. I see at least three issues with the numbers. Or is it just me?

(Might need a bit more detail?)

image15zb.jpg
 
Last edited:
$6737 for BC????? :eek:

Pass.

What have they got, lifts, pools and gyms????

Advert levy, WTF is that?

Maintenance? Vacancy? LL Insurance?
 
Are they in one of those resort style complexes? With multiple pools, expansive gardens , sauna, spa, tennis court, gym etc etc.
 
There is no interest included.

$350,000 @ 6% = $21,000 pa.

That would make them severely negatively geared.

The yield would be 7% based on rent and purchase price. This sounds good, but the bc fees are very high which will break the deal. If it is just a duplex why is the BC so high?
 
I think the agent has just presumed the same person would buy both and has doubled everything.

The $6k body corporate etc would be for both.
 
Back
Top