So in conclusion:
Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Indonesia: Dangerous, highly volatile?
More exactly, speculative in essence and, as a result, volatile.
Many Aussie investors make the mistake that property investment in SEA is the same as in Australia. Here we generally follow the “classical” investment strategy which essentially consists of buying assets that can produce steady income on a long term basis.
SEA is all about speculation, not only in property but in all types of assets. People disregard income and are focused on explosive short term gains that evade taxation. They buy in and out quite frequently on the basis of hearsay/sentiment/insider info.
At this game most foreigners lose their shirts. Very few succeed but still on a very smaller scale than the local tycoons.
Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong: Governed by British law system, safer investments but high costs of entry makes CG low?
Yes generally speaking.
In emerging countries the maturity of the economy can be measured by the lack of corruption and the respect of property.
So consider this.
On Transpacrency International corruption index, these countries are ranked very low: China 75th, Thailand 80th, India 95th, Indonesia 100th, Vietnam 112th, Philippines 129th, Laos 154th, Cambodia 164th.
Compare this with Singapore 5th, Australia 8th, Japan 14th, Taiwan 32th, Korea 43th.
The same thing is happening on the International Property Rights Index: India 55th, China 59th, Philippines 73th, Thailand 87th, Indonesia 103th, Vietnam 109th.
Whereas Singapore is 4th, Japan 4th, Hongkong 20th, Australia 18th, Taiwan 22th, Korea 27th.
Malaysia is in a hybrid situation being 60th on transparency and 39th on property rights.
All in all Vietnam is the worst followed by Indonesia and the Philippines.