Hi All,
Was most interested in the article by Rob Balanda in the latest API magazine
page 69/70 and/or nominee article.Briefly an investor signed a contract in her own name and had the words and/or nominee added after her name as she was not sure in which structure to buy the house.(Time constraints and unable to contact her advisers on the day).She proceeded to buy the house in the name of a family trust .Just prior to settlement her solicitor advised her that an additional 100% stamp duty was payable because she had exercised the and/or nominee provision of the contract.
This occured in Qld (the low tax state) and looks like double dipping to me.By exercising a and/or nominee clause the Office of State Revenue deems it to be another sale of the property even though there is only one contract of sale.
Robs advice in the article is to seek advice well before you enter into a contract. Do the forum members have any other ideas on how to avoid this
sting assuming they still want to insert the and/or nominee clause .
Does this make the and/or nominee clause useless and expensive in Qld ... is there another clause that could be used to acheive the desired result without the double whammy stamp duty or do you need to know exactly
who is going to be the eventual purchaser before you start looking.
I will be interested in your thoughts and ideas.
Cheers
Houn Dog
Was most interested in the article by Rob Balanda in the latest API magazine
page 69/70 and/or nominee article.Briefly an investor signed a contract in her own name and had the words and/or nominee added after her name as she was not sure in which structure to buy the house.(Time constraints and unable to contact her advisers on the day).She proceeded to buy the house in the name of a family trust .Just prior to settlement her solicitor advised her that an additional 100% stamp duty was payable because she had exercised the and/or nominee provision of the contract.
This occured in Qld (the low tax state) and looks like double dipping to me.By exercising a and/or nominee clause the Office of State Revenue deems it to be another sale of the property even though there is only one contract of sale.
Robs advice in the article is to seek advice well before you enter into a contract. Do the forum members have any other ideas on how to avoid this
sting assuming they still want to insert the and/or nominee clause .
Does this make the and/or nominee clause useless and expensive in Qld ... is there another clause that could be used to acheive the desired result without the double whammy stamp duty or do you need to know exactly
who is going to be the eventual purchaser before you start looking.
I will be interested in your thoughts and ideas.
Cheers
Houn Dog