Update:
BA I hired came back with three properties after looking at many (I hope).
1. Property 1: Originally asking $$386,000, now reduced to $379,000
2. Property 2: Asking $369,000
3. Property 3: Originally $377,000, now reduced to $360,000 plus
All 4 bedroom, 2 bathroom, double lock-up garage.
He favours the Prop 1.
It is 7 years old has a tenant (a single mum) who is on a periodic renting at $340 per week – this rent was reduced when the property went on the market so the tenant would allow easy access to potential buyers.
The property has a Council easement at the very back of the property.
According to his current market valuation (CMA) - not a professional valuation - using his research software. The resulting ‘Sales Estimate’ is $376,521.
He sent through Comparable Sales, Most Recent Sales and all Sales in that street. According to the other stats the asking price appears reasonable. Unfortunately all “Sales in that street” are 2009 sales.
He is suggesting to buy for $370K offering $360K.
I told him that even I (as a simple dad) can get at least 5% reduction in price so he has to do better.
Any expert advice would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
devank
ps: I did identify the Prop1 (out of three) as a good value for money at earlier stage. He didn't like other two for various reasons.
I normally go in a bit lower to start negotiations, however I don't know which area you are talking about, maybe the asking price is reasonable.
What are comparable sales prices for the last few months for the same type of property?
Is the $340/wk the reduced rent price, or the price before it was reduced? What is the market rate, as that is where you need it to be back at, and as soon as possible.
Assuming it is periodic and you can move this tenant out if they can't afford to pay market rent, how hard is finding a tenant for this type of property? However, I assume being somewhere in South Brisbane it will be relatively easy to rent out at market.