I have just reviewed a website with a number of people having a title called:
1. Wealth Consultant
2. Wealth Adviser
3. Property Wealth Manager
4. Property Wealth Consultant
5. Wealth Specialist, etc, etc.
For clients to respect these professions, wouldn't it be fair to say that the necesary experience required in these fields would be that they are wealthy people (Not rich as rich does not necessarilly relate to money). Surely you have to walk the walk before you can be labelled a wealth consultant??
Also got me thinking as to why aren't most financial planners financially 'free'. For a career working as a financial planner, you would have to be doing it for the love of it if you are above 50 wouldn't you?? (If financial planners aren't financially free, what hope have the rest of us got if we seek their advice?)
F
1. Wealth Consultant
2. Wealth Adviser
3. Property Wealth Manager
4. Property Wealth Consultant
5. Wealth Specialist, etc, etc.
For clients to respect these professions, wouldn't it be fair to say that the necesary experience required in these fields would be that they are wealthy people (Not rich as rich does not necessarilly relate to money). Surely you have to walk the walk before you can be labelled a wealth consultant??
Also got me thinking as to why aren't most financial planners financially 'free'. For a career working as a financial planner, you would have to be doing it for the love of it if you are above 50 wouldn't you?? (If financial planners aren't financially free, what hope have the rest of us got if we seek their advice?)
F