Sunfish
Would you care to elaborate on that statement - I would be very interested in your thoughts/reasons!
Cheers
LynnH
OK, but be aware that I am just a clapped out tradesman. Outside my job, I knew almost nothing till I got broadband so now I can boast that I know more than "almost nothing".
I say "inflation", BV says "no inflation". That's OK. This is just a discussion board. BV says deflation is the threat while I think "depression". This may be little more than different definitions. I think a little deflation (which we are possibly seeing some of already) will rapidly look like depression and will scare the pants off bankers worldwide who will apply the only known cure.... re-flation.
(They are on TV now)
I have mentioned
Keynesians more than usual lately but this is fair enough: They rule the world where economics is concerned. They cured the Great Depression (after the fact). John Kenneth Galbraith belonged to the school and was both a thinker and a Humanist. His writings on The Great Depression are still considered important works. I have no wish to criticise such a man but it is always reasonable to test theories after the passage of time. It goes without saying Greenspan, Bernanke and Pitt St are Keynesians.
So can the same economists who got us into this mess, lead us out of it? The Austrian School has been vocal for most of the oughties decrying the stupidity of US monetary policy, and by association, ours. We "printed" more money (as a percentage) than they did. Yuk! According to the Austrians, increasing money in circulation
is inflation.... by definition. They concede that the affect on prices is delayed if that new money goes into assets (who objects to asset inflation?) but it will filter down. Austrians say unequivacably that increasing the money supply is the inflation. Rising prices is just the filtered down result.
Why have we been increasing money supply so consistently? The excuses come as easily to them as reasons for another drink to an alco. First it was the dot.com crash. Nothing some easy money can't fix. Then Y2K. Money worked a treat again. 9/11, LTCM, Enron and other mini-disasters continued and Greenspan poured more good money at the problems.
It got to where the US bank bill rate was 1% and AAA rated banks could also borrow from BofJ @0.25% and lease gold from central banks at varying rates, never over 1%. If you could borrow billions of $s at those rates, wouldn't you travel to the ends of the earth looking for someone to borrow from you @ 5%? It seems they found the players.
So where are we now? The patient is haemoraging profusely and needs massive transfusions of liquidity to survive. In my mind I took this analogy much further to include aenemic donors and more, but let's not go there.
These new dollars just add to the existing pool of money so inflation is inevitable. More money, same goods equals inflation. Even Keynesians accept this, sort of.
So why has my attitude to property investing changed? I always felt that the Jan Somers' model needed property to double every 7 yrs to work. If it only doubled every 10 yrs then it was marginal. Doubling every 12 and it was underwater. I also dumped on the idea that inflation "inflated away" your debts because in my (quite long) lifetime, interest rates were always well above inflation so we met the inflation component every year with hard cash.
That is about to change! Soon inflation rates will be very high
because interest rates are forced down so low. The central banks will be caught between the massive implied threat of deflation and the equally massive truth of inflation. Trust me. Keynesists will always choose "inflation".