Your net worth.

Your net worth.

  • Under $50,000

    Votes: 5 2.6%
  • $50,001 - $75,000

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • $75,001 - $100,000

    Votes: 5 2.6%
  • $100,001 - $125,000

    Votes: 9 4.6%
  • $125,001 - $150,000

    Votes: 5 2.6%
  • $150,001 - $175,000

    Votes: 3 1.5%
  • $175,001 - $200,000

    Votes: 5 2.6%
  • $200,001 - $250,000

    Votes: 9 4.6%
  • $250,001 - $300,000

    Votes: 10 5.2%
  • $300,001 - $400,000

    Votes: 13 6.7%
  • $400,001 - $500,000

    Votes: 12 6.2%
  • $500,001 - $600,000

    Votes: 17 8.8%
  • $600,001 - $700,000

    Votes: 9 4.6%
  • $700,001 - $800,000

    Votes: 6 3.1%
  • $800,001 - $900,000

    Votes: 5 2.6%
  • $900,001 - $1,000,000

    Votes: 4 2.1%
  • $1,000,001 - $1,250,000

    Votes: 9 4.6%
  • $1,250,001 - $1,500,000

    Votes: 13 6.7%
  • $1,500,001 - $2,500,000

    Votes: 18 9.3%
  • Over $2,500,001

    Votes: 35 18.0%

  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Yes there is Geoff. Go buy yourself a choccy frog for Easter and then you'll slot right in.

As an exercise in frugality, I'm following the example of a departed member and buying my choccy frog in the after Easter sale at the bargain shop. Those dates are just a guide, right?

45c for a frog will keep me in no investor's land.
 
This poll measures the assets and does not include the assets which have been converted to current annuities. At best it shows an understatement of one's financial worth.

:D
 
This poll measures the assets and does not include the assets which have been converted to current annuities. At best it shows an understatement of one's financial worth.

:D

Wouldn't the value of an annuity be an asset?

The poll is nothing serious. Excluding the value of a PPOR can also give a skewed result.
 
This poll measures the assets and does not include the assets which have been converted to current annuities. At best it shows an understatement of one's financial worth.

:D

Annuities can be converted to approximate present value lump sum equivalents in order to count them as assets.
 
Based on Australian bureau of stats findings, at 2.5 mil net worth, you are on the verge of making it into the top 5%.

http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]&prodno=6554.0&issue=2011%9612&num=&view=


The ABS reference provides data by quintiles and deciles.

The HILDA study provides:


Wealth in Australia, as in other countries, is very unequally distributed, and indeed much more so than income. The wealthiest 10 per cent of households have a mean net worth of $1.56 million, with the median being $1.19 million. The wealthiest 5 per cent actually average $2.15 million, with a median of $1.65 million. To be precise, 7.0 per cent of households have net wealth over $1 million. One can be sure, though, that most of them would not regard themselves as millionaires.

Remember this is based on households, but the SS poll is based on net worth per person. Members qualifying for the top scale of the SS poll, if a couple, could be in the top 2%.
 
I made this for fun. Then I thought I ought to share it:

2hewuj5.png


It's a bit lumpy due to valuations.

I joined 702 days ago.
 
Last edited:
A good exercise. Something I did 20 years ago.

It's a bit lumpy due to valuations.

No it's not, it just appears lumpy because your vertical scale is so small. Increase the scale up to a decent size and the line will become flat again. The lumps and variations will disappear.

Change the vertical scale like that another 3 times as the decades tick by and you'll not notice the variations in the first 5 years. It will just appear to be one flat horizontal line.

The miracle of compounding interest always occurs in the last few years.
 
Back
Top