We have had a tenant vacate one of our NSW IP's 13 months early.
This new PM (same agency) has allowed the tenant to vacate the premises with only 2 weeks verbal notice and has issued the full bond back.
The first we know about is on our rental statement.
Now considering that the tenant was already 2 week in arrears, I calculate that I have lost 4 weeks of rent (plus whatever time it takes to lease the IP) plus all the usual reletting fees.
When I emailed a please explain, I was informed that unfortunately there was a mix up and that they would persue the tenant through the tribunal at my cost.
When I informed the agency that this was not acceptable and at the very least the agency should be reimbursing me the 2 weeks short notice of rental and the rental bond to cover the damages, I was advised that my requests where unreasonable.
Obviously I will changing the agency, but do you think my request was unreasonable?
This new PM (same agency) has allowed the tenant to vacate the premises with only 2 weeks verbal notice and has issued the full bond back.
The first we know about is on our rental statement.
Now considering that the tenant was already 2 week in arrears, I calculate that I have lost 4 weeks of rent (plus whatever time it takes to lease the IP) plus all the usual reletting fees.
When I emailed a please explain, I was informed that unfortunately there was a mix up and that they would persue the tenant through the tribunal at my cost.
When I informed the agency that this was not acceptable and at the very least the agency should be reimbursing me the 2 weeks short notice of rental and the rental bond to cover the damages, I was advised that my requests where unreasonable.
Obviously I will changing the agency, but do you think my request was unreasonable?