I am thinking of buying land in the country and maybe renting it out to farmers.
If I buy a house in the city (in Melbourne) I will have to save around $400,000. However, I can buy land in the country with as little as $40,000.
Many people here say that investing in property is better than investing in the share market. However, most property in cities are correlated to stock market performance (source House Prices Fall in Top Suburbs). This makes sense since property prices there are directly related to wages, which in turn, are related to business profits, which drive share market prices. Houses in cities are used mainly as places to stay in order to be close to work. If wages from work goes down or if unemployment increases, the value of these properties will decline.
Would buying only country land be a good idea?
If I buy a house in the city (in Melbourne) I will have to save around $400,000. However, I can buy land in the country with as little as $40,000.
Many people here say that investing in property is better than investing in the share market. However, most property in cities are correlated to stock market performance (source House Prices Fall in Top Suburbs). This makes sense since property prices there are directly related to wages, which in turn, are related to business profits, which drive share market prices. Houses in cities are used mainly as places to stay in order to be close to work. If wages from work goes down or if unemployment increases, the value of these properties will decline.
Would buying only country land be a good idea?