Hi all,
I think I hijacked this thread into what AMP is doing rather than the original concept that I was trying to get across. That being the fallacy of buying assets that are DECREASING in value.
I could have used Telstra or News Corp or BHP or Southcorp or a host of other companies that have been making new 52 week lows over the last few months.
The point being that investors should be looking at assets that are APPRECIATING in value. Have a in the new highs/new lows section of the financial press. You notice that over a period of a couple of weeks or months the companies that are in the new highs section tend to be the same companies, the same can be said about those in the new lows section.
It occurs to me that many on this forum who are canny and savvy property investors, by buying in growth areas that were rising and continue to do so, would think the opposite strategy should work in the stockmarket.
Who on this forum would buy in Magoo West where the price of a 3 br house is $100,000 now, but was $120,000 last year, $140,000 the year before, and $160,000 the year before that( the yield is also declining). Some may say that it's a good time to buy as prices can't go down much more but they probably thought that last year and the year before as well.
In comparison to others on this thread and another thread where not losing as much as the asx200 seems to be a good thing, my shares were at new 52 week highs when I purchased about a month ago. They were at new 52 week highs when this thread was started, and since then have continued. They are showing a 40% rise on my purchase price and nearly 20% in the last week and a half.
Isn't it better to jump aboard the moving train, rather than stand in front of it telling it to go the other way???
bye
happy investing