We have sold our PPOR and settlement is due on Friday this week. The purchaser did their final inspection yesterday and all went well except for two issues.
When they did the building inspection they found a couple of broken tiles on the roof (which we knew about). One has a corner cracked off it and another had been cracked right down the centre but my husband just coated it in silicon and nothing leaked. I agreed that we would replaced the tile with the silicon on it as we had one spare tile. Now they have come back saying there are 3(!) broken tiles that we have not replaced and that we had an agreement to replace them. We DID replace the tile I agreed to replace. This agreement was all verbal and there is nothing in writing or signed.
Also, they are saying the house needs cleaning - vacuuming, mopping etc. They must be on some good drugs because the entire house HAS been vacuumed and mopped, benches wiped, bathrooms and toilets cleaned and cupboards wiped inside and out. I might have missed a bit of skirting with the vacuum but the house is at least in the same state as when they inspected it, probably a bit cleaner as it was cleaned without kids running around in there!
I told my solicitor I'm not going back to the house (we have moved 100kms away and I am utterly exhausted after doing at least 14 trips back and forth over the last couple of weeks - with 3 small children in tow!). She asked if they insisted would I be willing to pay someone to go and clean the house and replace the tiles. I said no, as we have replaced the tile we agreed to replace and in my opinion the house is clean.
I'm also a bit peeved that they are being so picky as we did other things to the place before we left that we didn't even really HAVE to do, just as a nice gesture (as well as leaving behind about 6 metres of firewood for them!) and we also sold the house to them at quite a reduced price to what we had advertised.
Do they have any rights here to make me do these things? Or am I within my rights to refuse?
When they did the building inspection they found a couple of broken tiles on the roof (which we knew about). One has a corner cracked off it and another had been cracked right down the centre but my husband just coated it in silicon and nothing leaked. I agreed that we would replaced the tile with the silicon on it as we had one spare tile. Now they have come back saying there are 3(!) broken tiles that we have not replaced and that we had an agreement to replace them. We DID replace the tile I agreed to replace. This agreement was all verbal and there is nothing in writing or signed.
Also, they are saying the house needs cleaning - vacuuming, mopping etc. They must be on some good drugs because the entire house HAS been vacuumed and mopped, benches wiped, bathrooms and toilets cleaned and cupboards wiped inside and out. I might have missed a bit of skirting with the vacuum but the house is at least in the same state as when they inspected it, probably a bit cleaner as it was cleaned without kids running around in there!
I told my solicitor I'm not going back to the house (we have moved 100kms away and I am utterly exhausted after doing at least 14 trips back and forth over the last couple of weeks - with 3 small children in tow!). She asked if they insisted would I be willing to pay someone to go and clean the house and replace the tiles. I said no, as we have replaced the tile we agreed to replace and in my opinion the house is clean.
I'm also a bit peeved that they are being so picky as we did other things to the place before we left that we didn't even really HAVE to do, just as a nice gesture (as well as leaving behind about 6 metres of firewood for them!) and we also sold the house to them at quite a reduced price to what we had advertised.
Do they have any rights here to make me do these things? Or am I within my rights to refuse?