Some of the great capitalists in History those two...Both died after taking a vow of poverty btw! Another great example - just like Australia is like Greece and Nauru!
Keep em coming.
AR, can you define what capitalism is?
Gandhi's main political tenent was that everyone should aim for self sufficiency, built on self responsibility.
Socialism however, sinisterly reverses this, in its focus on human rights, which are nothing more than a nefarious and underhanded claim on the wealth of others.
In fact, Gandhi had been asked to help write the UN's Charter of Human Rights, but he refused saying, "in my experience, it is far more important to have a charter for human duties.". hahahaha....but that didn't sit well with the socialist driven UN.... FAIL!!!! MY BAD!!!!
Gandhi's focus on self responsibility makes him the greatest of Libertarians and capitalists. He believed man found the truest life meaning in questing diligently for union with God. And that quest meant God should be relied on for directing one how to achieve material security. There was to be no claim on other men, their labor, time, or wealth. To lay claim on the wealth of others for wellbeing, is to turn one from relying on God's direction.
Gandhi's views were libertarian in that he believed the only obligation one's rights impose on others is for others to leave you alone.....free to
ACT to pursue survival and a meaningful life.
This is the total antithesis of socialism.
Gandhi's spiritually based life meaning was perfectly aligned with the views of Ayn Rand, who succinctly penned:
"I swear -- by my life and by my love of it -- that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."
Indeed, Gandhi's spiritual basis for existence upholds that "every man is an end in himself, and that other men are not his pawns, nor is he theirs".
Contrast this with the socialist's grab for wealth generated by others......and.what is the limit of that grab? Look at Rudd. He has already spent future tax revenue, before people have toiled to produce it. Rudd's socialist beliefs make him feel totally comfortable about claiming evermore of others' wealth to distribute as he sees fit. What role did Australia have in future tax revenue being allocated to insulation, plasma tv's, overpriced school upgrades.
Socialists would do well to follow Gandhi's philosophy of self sufficiency - the self generation of enough wealth to ensure one's survival and a meaningful life.
Do you see where the difference is AR?
Gandhi's focus was on producing......Socialism's focus is not......which is why Rudd and co are selling off nationalized utilities for others to do the producing.