I have had an absolute blast debating the issues with people on this forum. People on the whole are pretty accomodating and interested to chat. But at the same time I've also go on people's nerves and I can understand why.
This section of the forum is clearly for people who aren't questioning the benefits of property as an asset category. They already believe in it and want to discuss issues at a lower level. For example (and I lifted this from the description) ... advice and strategy discussions, negotiating techniques etc. For example if there was a forum about the love of snowboarding and it was constantly bombarded with facts (albeit logical 'facts') as to why snowboarding sucks it would tend to irratate people right?
But at the same time I think some opposing views on the future of this asset category is useful. Especially for potential new entrants who might be sucked in by the 'hype' - they need all sides of the story. There are some clear problems of logic at a macroeconomic level that people can't explain and it indicates some real problems moving forward. For example,
* How can house prices always outstrip wages?
* How can house prices always outstrip rent?
* Why should house prices ever rise in real terms (> CPI) ?
* What is the limit to household debt?
* How can you always sell an economic loss making asset for a higher price to a future buyer?
So I'll start a thread in the "Property Market Economics" section called "Logic Police" and we will try to keep it to these big macroeconomic problems.
I can't control the other 'bears' out there but I'll be confining my big picture questions mainly to this area of the forum in the future. Hopefully some pro-property people will turn up and deliver some good answers - otherwise it will be boring!
This section of the forum is clearly for people who aren't questioning the benefits of property as an asset category. They already believe in it and want to discuss issues at a lower level. For example (and I lifted this from the description) ... advice and strategy discussions, negotiating techniques etc. For example if there was a forum about the love of snowboarding and it was constantly bombarded with facts (albeit logical 'facts') as to why snowboarding sucks it would tend to irratate people right?
But at the same time I think some opposing views on the future of this asset category is useful. Especially for potential new entrants who might be sucked in by the 'hype' - they need all sides of the story. There are some clear problems of logic at a macroeconomic level that people can't explain and it indicates some real problems moving forward. For example,
* How can house prices always outstrip wages?
* How can house prices always outstrip rent?
* Why should house prices ever rise in real terms (> CPI) ?
* What is the limit to household debt?
* How can you always sell an economic loss making asset for a higher price to a future buyer?
So I'll start a thread in the "Property Market Economics" section called "Logic Police" and we will try to keep it to these big macroeconomic problems.
I can't control the other 'bears' out there but I'll be confining my big picture questions mainly to this area of the forum in the future. Hopefully some pro-property people will turn up and deliver some good answers - otherwise it will be boring!