We have often watch that show. Last night was just another example of the producers trying to squeeze far to big a subject into too short a time.
They should have just stuck to onesubject only and ran with it for the whole program. That would then allow for a more indepth discussion.
If what the HIA guy says is 50% true, how would the ecconomy survive if the main assest(s) we have which is what finances everything looses its value by such a dramatic amount in so short a time. He has to have said what he did to boost his indutries sales numbers. Surley.
I like the big bad property invester wont let the single mum have a home bit....well, I could see it is what they wanted to say anyway.
Good luck to the teacher who made the most of the cheaper homes to.
The 100grand guy, I think I seen him on the show before also.
They should have just stuck to onesubject only and ran with it for the whole program. That would then allow for a more indepth discussion.
If what the HIA guy says is 50% true, how would the ecconomy survive if the main assest(s) we have which is what finances everything looses its value by such a dramatic amount in so short a time. He has to have said what he did to boost his indutries sales numbers. Surley.
I like the big bad property invester wont let the single mum have a home bit....well, I could see it is what they wanted to say anyway.
Good luck to the teacher who made the most of the cheaper homes to.
The 100grand guy, I think I seen him on the show before also.