LCD or Plasma Television

I am thinking about buying a new big screen TV and am quite confused about whether it should be a Plasma or LCD.

Has anyone bought one of these and can tell me what they think. I have had people say "don't buy a Plasma buy an LCD it is the only way to go" and other people say the opposite!!

I am thinking about a 40-42 inch screen.

All views appreciated.

Julieo
 
Gimme LCD

At a basic level LCD's are more expensive than Plasma's. For example, for $4,000 you will get a bigger plasma TV than LCD.

Plasma TV has a wider viewing angle, so you can sit on a more side on angle to the TV and still be able to watch it. LCD has a tighter viewing angle.

Plasma TV has a quicker refresh rate due to the quicker response time of each pixel. This makes the plasma better for video (tv).

LCD has smaller pixels, allowing higher quality viewing, the reason LCD's are used as computer monitors (very good graphics).

Plasma can 'burn' onto the screen. If you left a video on pause for a long time the picture can 'burn' that image onto the screen. LCD does not suffer from this.

Personally, if I was to buy a new TV I would go with LCD, purely for the quality. You will also be paying for it though. But by the same token I am more than happy with my CRT and do not intend on getting rid of it for about another 20 years (don't expect that kind of life from either Plasma or LCD).

Differing views welcome,

BR
 
Agree with a lot of what BR says..

Plasma is also better in a darker room, LCD in a lighter room..

Plasma can 'burn' onto the screen. If you left a video on pause for a long time the picture can 'burn' that image onto the screen. LCD does not suffer from this. ..This is a bit of a bummer and the main reason I would go with LCD as well as the fact LCD is a better picture.

LCD prices have been dropping lately,BENQ has some great models.

REDWING
 
Thanks guys for the great feedback. I was veering toward the LCD, the main reason being that I remember so well when Plasma first came in and they had it it clubs, pubs etc, unless the room was quite dark it was hard to see the image clearly on the screen. They have probably improved since then but my main criteria is for a sharp picture so I would probably go with LCD.

Thanks again :)
 
Before buying the tv, try to watch a dark movie like The Matrix etc etc instead of a bright shiny cartoon. They always have cartoons on them to make them look better.
 
I have a 42" Plasma which is sensational. LCD are not as good from an angle and only goes to 40". Plasma are heavier however and don't forget to find out how much it will cost you after installation.

Must admit I do love my plasma :D

Kev
www.gogecko.com.au
 
I recently bought a 50" Fujitsu plasma TV, after extensively researching the market, and visiting multiple shops etc etc.

I came to a few conclusions:

1) plasma burn in as discussed above
2) LCD can suffer from fade though in some areas over time
3) LCD dearer, but better picture in smaller screens
4) 42 inch and above, forget LCD

If you are going to buy 42" or above, I suggest Fujitsu plasma, for quality and price (second choice 42" Hitachi for good price and picture). I know for certain that Fujitsu is miles better than any other brand that I saw including Panasonic, LG, Pioneer, Hitachi etc etc

THe price can vary hugely, the 50" Fujitsu I bought was $16 000 in one shop, $12 000 in Hardly Normal at Tweed and under $8 000 where I bought it.

You can get the Fuji 42 for $4k if you look around, I found the Hitachi was very good as well though, and a lot cheaper.

You also need to consider HD or SD when looking (high def and standard def).

P.S. THe pic on the 50" Fujitsu with SOny surround sound system is awesome! I found the refresh on LCD definitely slower - go and check the Fujitsu is different to the others for sure. Not sure if this is correct or retail bull, but was told from a couple of people that Fujitsu were the first to patent the plasma technology, might explain why the pic is so good if true.

THere is no justification for spending on plasma, except if you have got it to spare and you want the lifestyle - go for it!
Cheers,

Tim
 
Kevin Hockey said:
I have a 42" Plasma which is sensational. LCD are not as good from an angle and only goes to 40". Plasma are heavier however and don't forget to find out how much it will cost you after installation.

Must admit I do love my plasma :D

Kev
www.gogecko.com.au

I only know a bit about the benq stuff, they should be bringing out a 47" LCD soon from memory..

http://www.benq.com.au/HomeProductList.asp?bc=18

I think Hardly Normal have a sale on ATM?

A quick OZ Google found this information..hope it helps?

Plasma vs LCD.


The two different camps of flat panel display standard will, of course, gladly spruik the advantages of their own standard and the deficiencies of the other. But which type of display, plasma or LCD, is right for you? And which will give you more bang for your buck?

1. Plasma and LCD technology - what's the difference?
Plasma and LCD panels may look similar, but the flat screen and thin profile is where the similarities end. Plasma screens, as its name suggests, uses a matrix of tiny gas plasma cells charged by precise electrical voltages to create a picture. LCD screens (liquid crystal display) are in layman's terms sandwiches made up of liquid crystal pushed in the space between two glass plates. Images are created by varying the amount electrical charge applied to the crystals. Each technology has its strengths and weaknesses, as you'll read below.




2. Is there a difference in picture quality between plasma and LCD screens and normal CRT TVs?
It's not what's happening behind the screen that's important - it's how the screen performs as a television that matters the most. In that regard, both plasma and LCD sets produce excellent pictures, although many home entertainment specialists will tell you they're not quite up to the standard of the bulky old CRT televisions yet (although they're quickly catching up).


Those same home entertainment specialists will tell you that for basic home theatre-like usage, plasma screens have a slight edge over LCDs. This is because plasma screens can display blacks more accurately than LCDs can, which means better contrast and detail in dark-coloured television or movie scenes. The nature of LCD technology, where a backlight shines through the LCD layer, means it's hard for it to achieve true blacks because there's always some light leakage from between pixels. This is steadily improving with every new generation of LCD, however.

3. What advantages does plasma have over LCD?
Apart from better contrast due to its ability to show deeper blacks, plasma screens typically have better viewing angles than LCD. Viewing angles are how far you can sit on either side of a screen before the picture's quality is affected. You tend to see some brightness and colour shift when you're on too far of an angle with LCDs, while a plasma's picture remains fairly solid. Plasmas can also produce a brighter colour, once again due to light leakage on an LCD affecting its colour saturation.



Plasma pundits will also tell you that some LCD screens have a tendency to blur images, particularly during fast moving scenes in movies or in sports. While that was true for older generation LCD screens, newer models have improved significantly - so much so that the differences in performance between LCDs and plasmas in this regard is almost negligible.




Perhaps the biggest advantage plasmas have now over their LCD cousins is price, particularly in the large screen end of the market. Plasmas can come in much larger sizes than LCDs at a cheaper price. Plasmas being sold in Australia generally run between 42" and 63" wide, with the cheapest 42" selling for between $3000 and $4000. 63" plasmas can go for as much as $20,000. LCDs, on the other hand, top out around the mid 40" mark, and are more expensive than similar plasmas. Sharp's high end 45" LC45G1XSYS LCD, for example, retails for $15,499, while Pioneer's top of the line 43" PDP-435HD plasma goes for $7999.

4. What advantages does LCD have over plasma?
It's not all doom and gloom for LCD though, as it has the edge over plasma in several key areas. LCDs tend to have higher native resolution than plasmas of the same size, which means more pixels on a screen resulting in a sharper image. This makes LCDs an ideal choice for any true high definition television you plan to watch.


LCDs consume less power than plasma screens, with some estimates ranging that power saving at up to 30 per cent less than plasma. LCDs are also generally lighter than similar sized plasmas, making it easier to move around or wall mount.


LCD pundits also point to the fact that LCDs have a longer lifespan than plasma screens. This was true of earlier plasma models, which would lose half of their brightness after more than 20,000 hours of viewing. Later plasma generations have bumped that up to anything between 30,000 and 60,000 hours. LCDs, on the other hand, are guaranteed for 60,000 hours.

You might have also heard that plasmas suffer from screen burn in, an affliction not as commonly associated with LCDs. Screen burn in occurs when an image is left too long on a screen, resulting in a ghost of that image burned in permanently. Newer plasmas are less susceptible to this thanks to improved technology and other features such built-in screen savers.




5. Which is better value for me right now: plasma or LCD?
If you're in the market for a big screen television, then we'd suggest plasma as a safe bet. Plasmas give you more bang for your buck at the big end of town, and while LCDs can give you better resolution, the price difference is currently too wide. However, if money's not an issue and you want the sharpest image in town, then a large LCD is for you. At the smaller end of things (15" to 36" TVs), LCD is the only way to go if you want something slim and tasteful.


Of course, both LCD and plasma screens are getting bigger and cheaper, so don't expect this recommendation to stay the same forever.
 
Tim said:
I recently bought a 50" Fujitsu plasma TV, after extensively researching the market, and visiting multiple shops etc etc.

If you are going to buy 42" or above, I suggest Fujitsu plasma, for quality and price (second choice 42" Hitachi for good price and picture). I know for certain that Fujitsu is miles better than any other brand that I saw including Panasonic, LG, Pioneer, Hitachi etc etc

Tim

I went with Hitachi :D I worked for Hitachi for 4 years (many years ago) and their TV's have always been high quality, better the devil you know ;)

Kev
www.gogecko.com.au
 
Boys!!! Geez, what is it with you guys?? :confused:

We have a 60" LCD (rear projection) in the (wait for it, I love this...) "theatre" room :rolleyes: and a 42" Plasma in the everyday family hang-out (the lounge room) and I STILL can't for the life of me, tell the difference between them except maybe for the size!!! The picture quality (from any angle) is awesome on both, so what gives?? But hey, it doesn't stop there, (hell no) it goes for sound systems as well!!! My husband bought a "top end" (this expression kills me :p) system years ago which cost him $40,000 by the time he bought all the bits and pieces, and after finally convincing me to stay in the room long enough for him to turn the thing on and give me a "demo" (almost blowing my eardrums to kingdom come) it sounded the same as the mind-shattering noise pollution that is emitted from my 12 year old's (mini system) bedroom day in day out (only LOUDER)!! :mad: IMO (and I'm sure to many of my sisters worldwide) it's most definitely "a guy thing" and the only "BIG" thing about any of these babies is their $$$ price tags!!

But we love you anyway fellas. Even though, for you. ..it has to look big, sound big, be BIG!!! WOW...lucky thing we're talking technology here and not physical dimensions. Could you imagine the visual/mental image this kind of description conjures up of say, a human backside??? :eek: eeeewwww
 
Monopoly said:
Boys!!! Geez, what is it with you guys??

But we love you anyway fellas. Even though, for you. ..it has to look big, sound big, be BIG!!! WOW...lucky thing we're talking technology here and not physical dimensions. Could you imagine the visual/mental image this kind of description conjures up of say, a human backside??? eeeewwww

Monopoly,

You should never talk about boys and being "big" in the same sentence, it causes all sorts of anxieties for some (obviously not for myself however :eek: )

As for those tv's being the no different with the same sound etc you have obviously had your hearing effected from years of shutting out noises of children crying, husbands complaining etc. You simply can't have a tv with low colour contrast, too little amount of pixels and sound without the surround. :D The cricket and footy has to be viewed as if you were there and movies must sound like you are at the theatre. It's now a recognised fact that some men actually become depressed, lonely and begin to lack self esteem without a tv of generous proportions. I'm sure there's been a study on it somewhere.

I have to stop because I can't concentrate properly, still getting visions of Monopoly's backside :confused: There are however some parts of the female anatomy which vastly improve their attraction to a male by being "big". :D Amen to that I say.

Kev
 
Kevin Hockey said:
The cricket and footy has to be viewed as if you were there and movies must sound like you are at the theatre.
But if you can't, then do what we women do all the time, FAKE IT!!! :p ;)
 
Might be the time for me to tout for business here.
I can help with a room , how big ? :p when ? :D
BTW, what was the thread ? :)
cheers
crest133
 
Back
Top