I thought Tony Windsor said it best:
FWA is not a judicial body. It cannot determine guilt. Thompson maintains his innocence. Until proven guilty in a court of law FWA's allegations are just that - allegations.
It doesn't matter whether I think he is guilty or not, or whether you think he is guilty or not or whether everybody thinks he is guilty or not. There is a constitutional requirement to separate the powers of the Parliament from the powers of the judiciary. There are extremely good reasons for that requirement. Maintaining that separation and the integrity of the process is far, far, far more important to our nation and its future than anything to do with the Member for Dobell.
Be careful what you wish for because the freedom of every individual in our society to a fair trial is at stake here. You can't just choose freedom when it suits you... you also have to fight for it even when it looks ugly and stinks, as in this case.