Retirment plan

Hmm,

I,m sure its not to late but I,m now thinking about retirement plans.

I,m 45yrs old with a high PPOR mortgage (LVR about 85%) and I ip with (LVR of 90%) yeild 5%.

Where do I start with a plan for retirment. Can anyone point me in the right direction, some examples maybe, web resources etc.

thanks
 
Start with a few numbers:

When do you want to retire
How much income do you need / want
What can you save

The make the numbers fit. If they don’t, change them by saving more, etc.
Alex
 
Its not too late. You still have heaps of good years left in you and time is the key.

Start off by reading Rich Dad Poor Dad and work your way up from there. Plenty of resources around and dont be afraid to ask questions.
 
Where do I start with a plan for retirment. Can anyone point me in the right direction, some examples maybe, web resources etc.

Hi Noel,

This is a post that describes my investment strategy that involves Villas & Townhouses.

It may be of interest to you for your retirement .

The capital growth averaging (CGA) strategy I employ utilises a regular purchasing cycle similar to what Dollar Cost Averaging is to the sharemarket. The major underlying principle to its success is it relies on your "time in" the market, NOT "timing" the market, and never never sell. So in other words it does not matter whether you buy at the top of a boom or at the bottom, just so long as you purchase good quality, well located property in high density areas ( metro area capital cities), at or below fair market value, on a regular basis. I've been purchasing IP per year and currently into year 6 of this 10 year plan.

I've been purchasing new or near new property over older style property for several reasons, the main ones being (in no particular order) -

1/ To maximise my Non-Cash deductions
2/ To minimise my maintenance & repair costs
3/ More modern & Attractive to tenants - thereby minimising potential
vacancy rates
4/ Ask a higher rent - thereby Maximising yields

Without getting into the "which is better debate, houses or Units??", I preferr to purchase Townhouses & Villas with a 30% or greater land component thereby eliminating multi story units or high rise apartments, for several reasons. The mains ones being (in no particular order) -

1/ lower maintenance & upkeep for the tenant
2/ lower purchase or entry level into a Higher capital growth suburb area
3/ rapidly growing marketplace (starting both now & into the future) wanting these type properties. This is due the largest group of people to ever be born (being the Babyboomers and Empty nesters) starting to come into their retirement years. They will be wanting to downsize for the following main reasons - lifestyle & economic.
4/ greater tax advantages & effectiveness thus maximises cashflow.
5/ able to hold more individual properties spread across your portfolio - thereby minimising area over exposure risks by not holding all your eggs in only a few baskets, so to speak

I look to buy in areas with a historic Cap growth of 7%pa and/or are under gentrification. I look to where the Govt, Commercial, Retail, private sectors are injecting money. This ultimately beautifies the area and people like the looks so move in creating demand.

I have found this works well if you are looking for short to medium term capital growth so as to leverage against and build your portfolio faster.

Getting back to CGA, as the name suggests it averages out the capital growth achieved on individual properties with your portfolio throughout an entire property cycle, taking into account that property doubles in value every 7 - 10 years. Thats 7%pa compounding.

The easiest way to explain what Im meaning by this is to provide a basic example taking into account that all your portfolio cash flow will be serviced via Wages in the initial acquisition stage, Rental income, the Tax man, Equity via an LOC and/or Cashbond structure, and any other forms of disposable income.

For ease of calculation lets say we buy a property for $250k, so in 10 years its now worth $500k. Now lets say we do that each year for the next 7-10 years. Now you can quit the rat race.

So in year 11 ( 10 years since your 1st Ip) you have 250K equity in IP1 you can draw out (up to 80%) Tax free to fund your lifestyle or invest with. In year 12 you do exactly the same but instead of drawing it from IP1 you draw it from IP2. In year 13 you do the same to IP3, in year 14 to IP4, etc etc etc. You systmatically go right through your portfolio year by year until you have redrawn from each property up to year 20.

So what do you do after you get year 20 I hear you say ?? hmmm..well thats where it all falls into a deep hole - You have to go get a JOB - nope only joking!

You simply go back to that first IP you purchased as its been 10 years since you drew upon it first time around and its now doubled in value ($1M) yet again - so you complete the entire cycle once again. Infact chances are you never drew each property up 80% lvr max , so not only have you got entire property cycle of growth to spend you still have what you left in it first time round that compounded big time. Now you wealth is compounding faster than you can spend it! What a problem to have

Getting back to what I said in my opening paragraph about it does not matter where you buy within a property cycle just so long as you do buy, This is because you will not be wanting to draw upon it until 10 years later after its achieved a complete cycle of growth.

Well thats the Basic Big Picture of CGA. Once its set up its a self perpetuating, TAX FREE Income Money Machine.

Noel, I hope this has helped you.
__________________
 
Hmm,

I,m sure its not to late but I,m now thinking about retirement plans.

I,m 45yrs old with a high PPOR mortgage (LVR about 85%) and I ip with (LVR of 90%) yeild 5%.

Where do I start with a plan for retirment. Can anyone point me in the right direction, some examples maybe, web resources etc.

Don't know about too late, but compared to now, it'll be later tomorrow, later still tomorrow, and even worse next year.
Alex
 
Following on from Alexlee's comments about doing the numbers, in my network we work out what income we would like in our retirement years. Let's say the figure is $100k pa, being great believers in property investing, we than calculate that on a yield of say 4.5% from IP's one needs approx $2.2m of property, with no debt to provide the income of $100k. There are various strategies for arriving at this situation including acquiring sufficient properties to ensure that you have enough of them to sell off to clear debts and leave you with $2.2m worth of property clear of debt. Personally this is why I like developing, so I can retain at least one property as my "profit" from each development. One of the keys is to surround yourself with a team which includes at least an accountant, property lawyer, finance broker and financial adviser who are all keen experienced property investors and who are using property as the centerpiece of their own financial plans. This team should be able to advise how you can accumulate properties without running into road blocks.
 
Back
Top