The other day a landlord explained to me that he wanted to change managers as the agent has upset the tenant, tis a commercial property.
Getting to the point the landlord conveyed what i understood to be the agent enforcing the terms of the lease. So I spent last night asking myself, why would a landlord fire their agent for enforcing the lease?
Granted this is a big deal for the landlord as the tenant pays a 6 figure rental and the property is located in a rural area but it got me thinking, what is more important. The tenant meeting their obligations or the tenant being "happy".
Just so we understand, the terms of a commercial lease are not those that most tenants are "happy" with.
An open line of communication with the landlord is important so this is another reason why I am getting the management. I am pretty black and white with tenants and this does upset them from time to time.
So my question to other forum users is, where would you (as a landlord) draw the line?
Getting to the point the landlord conveyed what i understood to be the agent enforcing the terms of the lease. So I spent last night asking myself, why would a landlord fire their agent for enforcing the lease?
Granted this is a big deal for the landlord as the tenant pays a 6 figure rental and the property is located in a rural area but it got me thinking, what is more important. The tenant meeting their obligations or the tenant being "happy".
Just so we understand, the terms of a commercial lease are not those that most tenants are "happy" with.
An open line of communication with the landlord is important so this is another reason why I am getting the management. I am pretty black and white with tenants and this does upset them from time to time.
So my question to other forum users is, where would you (as a landlord) draw the line?