Reply: 2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
From: Sim' Hampel
James, I think you are missing the point slightly.
I think we all respect the rights of people to write and ask questions here.
There is a line of questioning, however, which people must be aware is not particularly conducive to responsiveness.
It is not that a question was asked by someone anonymous, it was the nature of the question.
I am sure many people have no problems sharing very personal details about exactly who they are and how much they are worth. But there are many still who will see that in the same light as a question like "what is the PIN for your ATM card ?".
If you don't see that, then that's great, you are obviously a very trusting person. Personally, even though my net worth is not particularly high (yet), but even more so if my net worth was in the 10s of millions, there is NO WAY I am going to respond to an anonymous post (with no email address or anything) in a public forum about my most intimate personal details.
I was just trying to point out the realities of this to Mr. or Mrs. Anonymous.
I would suggest an alternative line of questioning (my additions in [ ]):
"Have been browsing through this site occassionally, and have found it to be very active and interesting. QUESTION: Are their any serious property investors out there under the age of 35 years, who would have nett assets soley in property of between 8 to 10 million. I am in a similar position and would like to hear from you and exchange ideas and thoughts on property. Property is my passion! " [... if you don't wish to discuss this publicly, you can email me on richdude@hotmail.com, I would love to chat with you !]
At least this way gives us a manner of contacting the person offline.
I am not against Anonymous posting... but I feel my earlier post about trust in relation to this particular type of question is critical.