Are you a buyer's agent, a bird-dogger; what?
The blurb at the start is lacking a lot of detail as many of the spruiker sites do. At least there's no photograph of you in the slick suit, or leaning up against the super-cool car alongside the mansion and the boat.
Sorry Nathan, it all sounds like a big Henry K spruik to me.
To achieve credibility in your statement that you are a property millionaire by aged 21, I'd say you would need to start with explaining exactly how you started, what you did/do for a real PAYE job first, because no-one starts without one unless their daddy subs them. In that case, you haven't made it - your daddy has made it for you.
"Gaining millionaire status by aged 21" says nothing special - it's an empty statement. It could mean you might have a million dollar value portfolio, but be LVR'd to almost 100% as many people are at this age. That's more easily done in the last 10 years of easy credit.
If it were true, and you were a NETT millionaire by 21 would lead me to believe that you would have to have started out with a very high PAYE income straight out of school, or be subbed by mum and dad; in which case the achievement is what you should have achieved on a high income - maybe a high income earner should have achieved more.
Now, if you told me you left school after VCE (or whatever it's called now), got a job in Maccas and saved a stack, bought a cheap property and kept plodding along until you hit 21 and owned a property outright, I'd find this more plausable and would be suitably impressed.
So, it might be advisable to go back and re-write the blurb with the warts and all details if they are there, and what the actual nett was at 21.
I clicked on the projects link and nothing happened. It would be good to see some examples of the "cfp from day one" and "buying well undermarket along with instant equity gains".
Let's put it this way; your average VCE student who goes out and gets an average job is never going to be worth $1 mill at 21.
If they do, they had some help, or saved every penny from the paper round at aged 13 upwards, and paid cash for their first house at 18. This is fine, but it needs to be included into the story so we can believe it.
Yes, I am a sceptic. Not saying you aren't doing well NOW, but a $mill at 21.....
I guess the argument is that you don't need to divulge details, but...you do.
The graphics are good though. More light maybe?
Now, to criticise the content might not be what was initially asked, but the content is part of the site, and is more important ultimately than the graphics and is part of the site's overall presentation.
